Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Don Victor Harbolt, Jr. v. Noah L. Alldredge, Warden, 432 F.2d 441, 10th Cir. (1970)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views1 page
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The court affirmed the judgment of the lower district court, finding the questions involved in the case to be unsubstantial. The appellant, Don Victor Harbolt Jr., was given an opportunity to address the underlying merits of the case and oppose summary action, which he did, but the court concluded the district court's judgment was correct after reviewing the case files and records along with Harbolt's submissions.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1970-10-22 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 432 F.2d 441 Docket: 295-70

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The court affirmed the judgment of the lower district court, finding the questions involved in the case to be unsubstantial. The appellant, Don Victor Harbolt Jr., was given an opportunity to address the underlying merits of the case and oppose summary action, which he did, but the court concluded the district court's judgment was correct after reviewing the case files and records along with Harbolt's submissions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views1 page

    Don Victor Harbolt, Jr. v. Noah L. Alldredge, Warden, 432 F.2d 441, 10th Cir. (1970)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The court affirmed the judgment of the lower district court, finding the questions involved in the case to be unsubstantial. The appellant, Don Victor Harbolt Jr., was given an opportunity to address the underlying merits of the case and oppose summary action, which he did, but the court concluded the district court's judgment was correct after reviewing the case files and records along with Harbolt's submissions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    432 F.

    2d 441

    Don Victor HARBOLT, Jr., Appellant,


    v.
    Noah L. ALLDREDGE, Warden, Appellee.
    No. 295-70.

    United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.


    Oct. 22, 1970.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
    Oklahoma.
    Don Victor Harbolt, Jr., pro se.
    Before LEWIS, Chief Judge, PICKETT, Circuit Judge, and KERR,
    District judge.
    PER CURIAM.

    Upon docketing, this case was assigned to the summary calendar in view of the
    unsubstantial questions involved and Harbolt was given an opportunity to
    address the underlying merits and oppose summary action, which he has done.

    A thorough review of the files and records in this case, along with the papers
    submitted by Harbolt, convinces us that the judgment of the district court is
    correct and that there is no necessity for further argument.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in 311 F.Supp. 688


    (W.D.Okl.1970).

    You might also like