Professional Documents
Culture Documents
9-07 RCC-KY Wayne Adaska PDF
9-07 RCC-KY Wayne Adaska PDF
Mixture Design
Dry enough to
support
pp vibratory
y
roller
Wet enough to
permit adequate
distribution of paste
Mixture Design
Differs from conventional concrete pavements
Not air-entrained
Lower water content
Lower paste content
Larger
Larger fine aggregate content
Nominal max. size aggregate
gg g
+/- 5/8 in.
Proportioning Methods
S
Several
l methods
th d available:
il bl
Concrete
Concrete consistency tests
Soil compaction methods
Optimal paste volume method
Solid suspensions model
Aggregate Selection
Aggregate selection
very important
Responsible for mix
workability,
segregation,
ti
ease off
consolidation
Pre-blended
P bl d d or
stored separately
Aggregate Selection
Select a sound, well-graded
g
aggregate
gg g
For stability under vibratory roller, aggregate
interlock for load transfer, highest
g
density,
y
reduced segregation
Crushed or uncrushed g
gravel or crushed stone
Crushed aggregates:
Require
Require more compactive effort
Require more water
Provide
P id greater
t stability,
t bilit lless segregation
ti
Provide higher flexural strength
Aggregate Selection
Highway base course
course, asphalt or concrete
aggregates can be used
5/8 in
in. NMSA
Provides smooth surface, reduces segregation
Aggregate Gradation
Sieve Size
in
mm
1"
25
3/4"
3/4
19
1/2"
12.5
3/8"
9.5
#4
4 75
4.75
#8
2.36
#16
1.18
#30
0.6
#50
0.3
#100
0 15
0.15
#200
0.075
Percent Passing
Actual
Minimum Maximum Gradation
100
100
100
95
100
100
75
90
85.2
65
85
75.0
40
60
57 0
57.0
25
50
43.5
20
40
34.2
10
30
24.3
7
20
10.6
5
15
21
2.1
2
8
0.7
Moisture-Density
Moisture
Density Relationship
Dry Density (llb/cf)
144
143
142
141
140
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
Moisture Content
7%
8%
28-Day C
Compresssive
Stren
ngth (psi)
Strength vs
vs. Cement Content
6,500
725
6,000
,
697
5,500
667
5 000
5,000
636
4,500
603
4,000
10%
569
12%
14%
Cement Content
16%
18%
Admixtures
Retarder
R
t d or water
t reducer
d
can b
be used
d tto
increase working time
Silica fume (7%) has resulted in
significant strength gains
Air entrainment not yet technologically
possible, but
p
Experience has shown RCC can be made
freeze/thaw resistant
Freeze-Thaw Durability
Field performance excellent, although not air
entrained
Minor surface paste (1/16) erodes, then
stabilizes
t bili
RCC results variable under ASTM C666 (F/T)
and C672 (Deicer scaling)
Tests appear
pp
to be too severe based on
actual experience
Durability tests used for masonry concrete
and precast units possibly more appropriate
Freeze-Thaw Durability
CTL Mix
2,106
1,378
3/4
2
504
0
211
none
0.42
152.0
5 460
5,460
7,900
690
900
Canada Mix
2,210
1,338
1/2
1
470
36 (silica fume)
172
5 (WR)
0.34
153.1
1,205
1,640
Construction
Construction Requirements
Subgrade preparation
Mixing
gp
process
Transporting
Placing
Compacting
Jointing
g
Curing
High-volume
applications
Excellent mixing
efficiency for dry
materials
250 to 500+
500 tons/hr
Mobile, erected on site
Mobile Mixers
Transporting
Rear dump trucks
normally used
Minimize transport
time
Covers required for
long hauls, or
h t/ i d conditions
hot/windy
diti
Transporting
Placing
Layer
y thickness
4 in. minimum
8 in. maximum ((10 in. with heavy-duty
y
yp
pavers))
Timing sequence
Adjacent lanes placed within 60 minutes for
fresh joint, unless retarders used
Multiple
Multiple lifts placed within 60 minutes for bond
Placing Equipment
High-density
g
yp
pavers
Vibrating screed
Dual tamping bars
High
g initial density,
y, 90-95%
Reduces subsequent
compaction
High-volume
g
placement
p
(1,000 to 2,000 cubic yards
per shift)
Designed for harsh mixes
Smoothest RCC surface
Placement Equipment
Placing Equipment
Conventional asphalt pavers
Provide some initial density
(80-85%)
Relatively smooth surface
May require modification
Increased maintenance
Compaction
Proper compaction
is critical for strength
and durabilityy
Compact to 98%
Modified Proctor
Vibratory roller
Rubber-tire roller
Construction Joints
Most critical area of project
Must be constructed properly for durability
Ensures
E
bond/interlock,
b d/i t l k so slab
l b acts
t
monolithically
Three
Th
ttypes off construction
t ti joints:
j i t
Fresh joints
Cold
Cold joints
joints
Horizontal joints
Fresh Joint
Edges Critical
Compaction more difficult
Segregation more likely
Try to minimize number of cold joints
Care needed to match g
grade from cold
to fresh joint
Edge Compaction
Compacting shoe
Edge Compaction
Cracking/Jointing
Saw-cut
Saw cut joints
unnecessary for
p
performance
Natural cracks provide
excellent load transfer
Saw-cut joints control
cracks for aesthetic
purposes
Natural Cracks
Most economical
15 to 60 ft spacing
Often first cracks
appear within 24 hours
Narrow
N
crack
k widths
idth
Seal if > 1/4 in.
Provide load transfer
Minimal raveling
New, Unsealed
Crack
10-yr Old
Sealed Crack
Saw-Cut Joints
More aesthetically
pleasing
Soff-cut
Soff cut very effective
effective,
shortly following
p
placement
Need to saw within 12
hours to avoid
uncontrolled
t ll d cracking
ki
1/3 to 1/4 depth
Seal joints similar to
conventional concrete
Curing
g
EXTREMELY IMPORTANT
Ensures surface durability; reduces dusting
Low moisture content in RCC; no bleed water
Three methods:
Moist cure
Concrete
Concrete curing compound
Asphalt emulsion
Water Cure
Concrete Curing
g Compound
p
White-pigmented concrete
curing compounds
Application rate depends
on surface texture
Surface Texture
Intermodal Yard, TX
Warehouse Facility, WI
Honda, AL
Quality Control
Quality Control
Aggregate quality
quality, gradation & moisture
Plant calibration
Density tests
Smoothness
Surface texture
Thickness
Strength
ASTM D1557
ASTM C1435
ASTM C1435
More Information
www.cement.org/pavements
Questions?
Discover how beautiful concrete can be
Prescriptive Examples
A
Aggregate
t gradation
d ti
Mix design including cement content
Type
yp of mixing
gp
plant
Type of paver
Type and size of compaction equipment
Method of curing
Performance Examples
Minimum strength
Minimum density
Production rate
Thickness
Smoothness
Combined Specification
Mix design/Compressive strength
Type of mixing plant/Production rate
Type and size of compactor/Density
Minimum number of passes/Density