Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Local Eating Cop
Local Eating Cop
Local Eating Cop
Topic: Local/Seasonal
Location: Concord, NH
Preceptor: Stephanie
323439481
page 1
The audience has likely heard that eating locally/seasonally is better, but
may not be familiar with all the reasons why. They may have grown up
on or around farms and naturally ate this way. The audience is probably
also aware that local produce tastes better. They are familiar with
general nutrition, the roles of common vitamins and minerals, as well as
nutrition pertaining to their own specific chronic conditions.
It is relevant for the audience to know the exact reasons why eating
locally/seasonally is better for their health, the local economy, and the
environment. They will want to know specific ways to eat locally more
often how, where, and when.
The population has varying levels of health. Based on the group from our
last presentation, some participants have very high health literacy, for
example one had a Chemistry degree and one had a past career in the
health science department of a college. Others have less experience in
health and nutrition and thus a lower health literacy. All come with a
genuine desire to learn.
b) Presentation resources
323439481
page 2
No
c) Cost of marketing:
$0
323439481
page 3
323439481
page 4
See attached.
Intrapersonal: Encouraging the audience to pick one new way they will
personally incorporate local produce into their routine. Audience
members will be provided a space on the handout to write down this
goal.
4. Explain how your planned evaluation method will show whether your
learning objectives were met.
The Wheel of Fortune game at the end of the presentation is designed to help
participants recall the different benefits of eating locally/seasonally in various
categories. The audience will be able to work in teams, which will boost
confidence. They will solve the puzzle easily if they use their memory to
recall the benefits from the presentation, so by observing the level of ease
323439481
page 5
they show in solving the phrases we will be able to evaluate whether they
met the first objective. Additionally, we plan on having audience members
share the ways they plan to personally include more local food in their
routine, evaluating our second objective.
5. What problems did you encounter in the development process?
Our original idea for our icebreaker did not work out during the test run so we
had to come up with a new one. We also had some trouble finding a food to
demo that was seasonal in New Hampshire in late April, easy for seniors to
make and chew, inexpensive, and low in Vitamin K since there have been
several participants refuse to eat any green vegetables with the explanation
that they are on blood thinning medication and we wanted to avoid this
argument.
323439481
page 6
were some great comments from a few audience members about agriculture,
eating locally, and what they grow at home. We had one particularly vocal
audience member who challenged many statements we made, went on long
tangents, made racial comments, and refused to be interrupted when we
tried to end the discussion and bring the focus back. This ended up
annoying other audience members and dissuading them from contributing. It
was frustrating for Carol Anne and I because we were trying and failing to
gain control of the conversation.
Stephanie thought the presentation was decent, but did not feel we really
excelled at anything. She helped us think of ways that we could effectively
address chattier audience members and prevent those kinds of situations
from detracting from the presentation. She did love our colorful and
informative brochure handout!
4. How well did the audience grasp your objectives?
It was hard to tell how well the audience grasped the objectives. In hindsight,
the Wheel of Fortune game might have been too difficult. It was hard to
determine whether they were struggling because the game was too hard or
because they didnt remember the points we talked about. For the second
objective, we did have a few of them share great goals to incorporate more
local foods in their diet.
5. What would you do differently/the same the next time - or what
would you change if you had more time? How effective do you feel
your program/material was for the target audience?
Next time I would really try extra hard to find local produce for the food
tasting, and if I could only find vitamin-K containing produce than I would
have just let participants decline tasting if they were concerned about intake.
Choosing and then trying to find a local item was difficult because all the Pcard holders are in clinical and have very limited availability to shop and the
farmers markets dont have much to offer yet.
I think the material was moderately effective for the audience. I think the
information was easy enough to understand (not too science-y) and built on
prior knowledge (or hearsay) that many of them already had from past life
experience. I think the aspect we helped the most with was making them
realize all the practical ways they can incorporate eating locally into their life.
6. Recommendations for future Interns:
Know that the room is pretty tight and it usually takes a good amount of time
to rearrange the tables and chairs when you arrive. It can also take some
time to connect your laptop, so we recommend getting there at 9:15.
Be prepared that some adults may dominate the conversation and go on
long tangents with their comments, so think about kind ways to effectively
interrupt them and regroup/get back on topic.
323439481
page 7
7. Financial Report:
Cost of Development: (Includes: labor for preparing the project, food cost
for testing the food activity; please note that labor costs include hours
worked by ALL team members)
Labor ($25/hour): (20 hours x 2 interns): $1000
Food: N/A
Cost of Presenting: (Includes: labor, food, flip charts ($28), see following
link for cost of copies http://www.keene.edu/mailsvs/printfees.cfm, and
other supplies)
Labor ($25/hour): $50 (1 hour presentation x 2 interns)
Copies: $2.40 (30 copies 2 sided)
Food: $9.47
Other supplies and costs:
Overall costs: $1061.87
Within one week of the presentation, provide internship preceptor with a completed
COP, Presentation Evaluation form, Handout(s), a Team Leader Report, and PDE if
completed by an outside supervisor. (PDE required for sites with 2 presentations or
>32 hours). Attach a copy of the materials, PowerPoint, and any handouts/resources
used for the presentation.
323439481
page 8