Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Commonwealth Property Advocate v. U.S. Bank National Assoc., 10th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    This document is an order and judgment from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirming the lower court's ruling in the case of Commonwealth Property Advocates v. U.S. Bank National Association. The issues presented had already been decided in prior cases. Counsel for the appellant was given a chance to distinguish these prior cases but instead used the opportunity to criticize them. As a result, the Tenth Circuit affirmed the lower court's ruling without further discussion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-03-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-4168

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an order and judgment from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirming the lower court's ruling in the case of Commonwealth Property Advocates v. U.S. Bank National Association. The issues presented had already been decided in prior cases. Counsel for the appellant was given a chance to distinguish these prior cases but instead used the opportunity to criticize them. As a result, the Tenth Circuit affirmed the lower court's ruling without further discussion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    Commonwealth Property Advocate v. U.S. Bank National Assoc., 10th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an order and judgment from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirming the lower court's ruling in the case of Commonwealth Property Advocates v. U.S. Bank National Association. The issues presented had already been decided in prior cases. Counsel for the appellant was given a chance to distinguish these prior cases but instead used the opportunity to criticize them. As a result, the Tenth Circuit affirmed the lower court's ruling without further discussion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    FILED

    United States Court of Appeals


    Tenth Circuit

    March 6, 2012
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    Elisabeth A. Shumaker
    Clerk of Court

    TENTH CIRCUIT

    COMMONWEALTH PROPERTY
    ADVOCATES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,

    No. 11-4168

    v.

    (D. Utah)

    U.S. BANK NATIONAL


    ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for the
    Adjustable Rate Mortgage-Backed
    Pass-Through Certificates, Series
    2007-2, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
    REGISTRATION SYSTEMS,

    (D.C. No. 2:10-CV-00281-DB)

    Defendants - Appellees.

    ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

    Before LUCERO, HARTZ, and OBRIEN, Circuit Judges.

    The issues presented in this appeal have been previously decided. Counsel
    were given an opportunity to distinguish our prior cases but Appellants counsel

    After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
    unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of
    this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is
    therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is
    not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata,
    and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value
    consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

    used that opportunity to criticize, rather than distinguish, them. There is nothing
    more to say. AFFIRMED.
    ENTERED FOR THE COURT
    PER CURIAM

    -2-

    You might also like