Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BBDM1023 Coursework Spesification (LATEST)
BBDM1023 Coursework Spesification (LATEST)
BBDM1023
BUSINESS ORGANISATION & MANAGEMENT
COURSEWORK SPECIFICATION
COURSEWORK ASSESSMENT
Assessment:
Coursework:
Examination:
50%
50%
Students are required to achieve a threshold of 50 marks (50/100) in order to pass the coursework
requirements.
Marks are allocated based on:
Coursework
Marks
1. Mid-term Test
20
50
3. Presentation
- Individual presentation
- Relevant topics based on group report
TOTAL
Percentage of Coursework
30
100
50%
Please note the above mentioned assessment method and marks allocation are subject to change by
the TAR University College without prior notice and assigning any reason thereof.
Students are required to present their final group assignment. Assessment will be held on week 10 during
tutorial session. Group work will be presented and marks awarded based on individual performance.
Power point presentation slides are the fundamental requirement for all students.
Power point slides limit to maximum 20 slides with the presentation time of 20-25 minutes for each group
including Q&A session. Presentation is assessed using the Presentation Assessment matrix as per
Appendix IV.
Criteria /
Peformance
Contents
Analysis
Written
presentation
Written layout
and design
-Citation
-Appendixes
-Reference
Excellent
(15-13)
High level of
understanding
about the questions
and able to provide
indepth answer
Good
(12-10)
Understood most
of the questions
and be able to
deliver correct
answer, but with
minor
amendment
Average
(9-7)
Understood
questions fairly
and answer all
questions
Poor
(6-1)
Limited
understanding about
questions and
unable to answer
questions
( 15, 14, 13 )
In-depth analysis
of information and
critically interpret
all information,
explore further in
the context of
study. Ability to
justify and
compare the
information from
different point of
view
( 12, 11, 10 )
Accurate analysis
of the data and be
able to transform
it into
information for
the context of
study
( 9, 8, 7 )
Offer only
average of or
minimal of
understanding the
whole concept
( 6 ,5, 4, 3, 2, 1)
Limited in offering
any analysis and
interpretation of the
information
regarding the study.
Somehow fail to
convert the facts
into the context of
study
( 15, 14, 13 )
Assignment
reflects clarity of
justification,
excellent in
framework through
adequate format
and referencing
( 12, 11, 10 )
Coherent
structure in
quality of works,
proper
presentation of
information.
( 9, 8, 7 )
Structure with
satisfactory
presentation of
information
( 6 ,5, 4, 3, 2, 1)
Poor writing report
with massiveness,
unstructured of
framework such as
spelling error and
inconsistent of
format
( 15, 14, 13 )
Excellent in
neatness, visibility
clarity, correctness
( 12, 11, 10 )
Good in
neatness,
visibility clarity,
correctness
( 9, 8, 7 )
Average neatness,
visibility clarity,
correctness
(3)
( 6 ,5, 4, 3, 2, 1)
Poor in neatness,
visibility clarity,
correctness
(5)
(2,1)
(4)
Total
Comments:
Total
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
PRESENTATION ASSESSMENT (30%): Appendix IV.
Name of student
Power point Communicatio Adequate of
presentation
n skill
concept and
(6 marks)
(6 marks)
example
(6 marks)
1.
Mode of
delivery
(6 marks)
Language
fluency
(6 marks)
Total
(30
marks)
2.
3.
4.
5.
Criteria
Power point
presentation
(6 marks)
Communicatio
n skill
(6 marks)
Adequate of
concept and
example
(6 marks)
Mode of
delivery
(6 marks)
Language
Excellent
(6 marks)
Excellent. Very clear
explanation with
supportive
elaboration. Display
of data indicated high
level of details
Good
(5-4 marks)
Displays are relevant
to the knowledge at
certain level with
minor error in
explanation.
Clearly communicated
desires, ideas,
personal needs and
feeling
Clearly presented
concept correctly and
provide adequate
example.
Usually shared
feeling and thoughts
with other partners
Was engaging
proactive and captured
the interest of the
audience maintained
this throughout the
entire presentation,
great visuals and
multimedia visuals
were shown
Students excel in
Be able to provide
correctly concepts
and express example
to address the area
of presentation
Was well done and
interesting to
audiences; was
presented in a
unique manner and
was very well
organised
Average
(3-2 marks)
Fair explanation.
Limited in
explanation of the
answer. Briefly go
through which lack
of interaction with
the concept and
relations to
theories.
Rarely expressed
feeling preferences
Poor
( 1 marks)
Lack of explanation
and unclear of
answer. Failed to
show the
interaction and
poor application of
theories.
Provide either
concept or example
accurately
Unable to express
the concept and fail
in provide any
example
Was at times
interesting and was
presented clearly
and precisely; was
cleaver at time and
was organised in
logical manner;
limited visual aids
provided
Students voice is
Never spoke up to
express excitement
and/or frustration
Students mumbles,
fluency
(6 marks)
pronounces words
to pronounce terms
clear but mostly
incorrectly
correctly and be able
or words correctly
read through the
pronounce terms
to attract interest of
and be able to
presentation
and speak too
audiences. Smooth
conduct the flow of
softly
presentation with
presentation.
good example and
concept provided.
General comments:
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Declaration
I/We confirm that I/we have read and shall comply with all the terms and conditions of TAR Colleges
plagiarism policy.
I/We declare that this assignment if free from all forms of plagiarism and for all intents and purposes if
my/our own properly derived work.
I/We further confirm that the same work, where appropriate, have been verified by anti plagiarism
software__________________ (please insert).
No
.
1
2
3
4
5
Student's name
Date: ________________
Student's ID No
Signature