Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Publish United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit: Filed
Publish United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit: Filed
Publish United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit: Filed
PUBLISH
SEP 18 2001
TENTH CIRCUIT
____________________________
PATRICK FISHER
Clerk
JESSICA N. MARTINEZ,
Individually and as the
natural mother and next friend
of DESEREE MARTINEZ,ALEESHA
MARTINEZ and CHRISTOPHER
MARTINEZ, minor children; et
al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
No. 00-8034
v.
JUDITH UPHOFF, Director of
Department of Corrections; et
al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
____________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Wyoming
(D.C. No. 99-CV-131-J)
____________________________
Terry W. Mackey, Hickey, Mackey, Evans & Walker, Cheyenne,
Wyoming, (Roger Fransen, Hickey, Mackey, Evans & Walker,
Cheyenne, Wyoming and Jason M. Tangeman, Anthony, Nichols &
Sharpe, LLC, Laramie, Wyoming, were with him on the briefs)for
Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Richard Rideout, Law Offices of Richard Rideout, PC, Cheyenne,
Wyoming, for Defendants-Appellees.
____________________________
Before SEYMOUR and BRORBY, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, Senior
District Judge. *
____________________________
BROWN, Senior District Judge.
____________________________
In this
More particularly,
The district
Uhlrig v. Harder,
64 F. 3d 567, 571 (10th Cir. 1995), cert. den. 516 U.S. 1118, 133
L.Ed. 853.
After a review of the record, we find that the trial court's
order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment should be
affirmed.
3
institution.
A prison
guard was present in the library at all times that plaintiff was
on duty until March 21, 1992, when the prison administrators
changed library hours and the schedule of the library guard.
few days later, plaintiff was on duty without a guard when she
572.3
In this case, the defendants can be liable only for acts
which created the danger that harmed Corporal Martinez.
These
Security Unit.
at the prison was that the Shift Command Office door should be
kept locked at all times, it appears that this rule was not
always followed because items issued to inmates were kept in the
office.
Court do not shed much light on what happened on June 26, 1997
when Corporal Martinez was attacked and murdered and leave open
to speculation why Corporal Martinez allowed the door to the
Shift Command Office to remain open and unlocked so as to allow
the inmates to gain entry to that office. (Ibid at p. 21).
After reviewing all of the evidence submitted by the parties
on the motion for summary judgment, the trial court determined
that
plaintiffs had failed to state a claim.
There was no
evidence that he or any other guard was not aware of "the mental
states or violent propensities" of inmates confined in the
Maximum Security Unit.
( Ibid. at p.
45)
We have considered plaintiffs reliance on Sutton v. Utah
State School for the Deaf and Blind , 173 F. 3d 1226 (10th Cir.
1999) and agree with the trial court's conclusion that it is
clearly distinguishable from the situation involving the Wyoming
State Penitentiary.
The school
These
The
As the lower court noted, the fact that inmates were tested
for drugs and that weapons had been confiscated through regular
searches tended to prove that prison officials demonstrated "an
affirmative step .... intended to eliminate or reduce risks to WSP
staff and guards...." ( Ibid at p. 44).
9
exception to the general rule that a state will not be liable for
the actions of private parties.
10