Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Howington v. Waters, 199 F.2d 87, 10th Cir. (1952)
Howington v. Waters, 199 F.2d 87, 10th Cir. (1952)
Howington v. Waters, 199 F.2d 87, 10th Cir. (1952)
2d 87
HOWINGTON
v.
WATERS.
No. 4500.
No appearances.
Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and MURRAH, Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the whole record, we are of the view that the judgment
of the trial court should be and is affirmed. See Gault v. Burford, 10 Cir., 173
F.2d 813; Odell v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 189 F.2d 300; Soulia v. O'Brien, 1 Cir.,
188 F.2d 233; Maxwell v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 175 F.2d 318; Sampsell v. People
of State of California, 9 Cir., 191 F.2d 721.