Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gac Fruit - Bioactive Compounds, Options For Processing, and Utilisation of Processed Products PDF
Gac Fruit - Bioactive Compounds, Options For Processing, and Utilisation of Processed Products PDF
!Gac fruit
Gac fruit, Momordica cochinchinensis Spreng, is botanically classified as Family Cucurbitaceae, Genus Momordica, and Species Cochinchinensis. It is also known as baby jackfruit, sweet gourd or
cochinchin gourd in English. The fruit is one of the traditional fruits in Southeast Asia in general, and in Vietnam in particular. The Gac plant can be cultivated from seeds or root tubers, and grows as
dioecious vines that are separate male and female plants (Fig. 1). The Gac fruit is typically round or ovoid in shape, with the exterior skin covered in short spines. Its green skin colour becomes red or
dark orange when ripe. Gac fruit (Fig. 2) comprises orange/yellow skin containing spines, yellow pulp and aril (red flesh surrounding the seeds). The fruit components are also presented in Table 1.!!
Table 1 Weight distribution of fresh Gac fruit (10 fruits)(10)!
Gac fruit
24.0 - 43.2
(2)
(1)
189.6 - 1248
14.4 - 49.6
(2)
0.1
(1)
(1)
16.0 - 144.8
(2)
na
Yellow pulp
3700195
49
Aril
1375147
18
Seeds
108452
14
Gac fruit can be processed in several ways (Fig. 3) including drying, extraction of oil, encapsulation and
incorporation into foods such as pasteurised juice and milk beverages, glutinous rice, yoghurt, pasta
(1)
43.0 - 67.2
154.6 - 305.4
(1)
140.0
Drying methods(6,7)
(1)
12.6 - 15.0
Skin(10)
Oil extraction(8,9)
Oil extraction
Air Drying
Air drying
Crude oil
Crude oil
na
Powder
Air dried
Encapsulation
(1)
85.8
(1)
41.8
Gac oil
Freeze dried
Encapsulated oil
Spray-dried
Table 3. Fatty acid composition and total oil content of Gac aril and seeds(3,4)
Myristic
Palmitic
14:0
16:0
!
16: 1 !
Stearic
18:0
Oleic
18:1 !!
!!
cis-vaccenic
18:1 !
Linoleic
18:2 !!!!"
!!!"!!"
18:3 !
of Gac fruit!
Aril
na
0.87
5.6
Palmitoleic
!-linolenic
Abbreviation
22.04
0.1
0.26
60.5
7.06
9.0
34.08
0.5
1.13
20.3
31.43
0.5
2.14
Arachidic
20:0
1.6
0.39
Gadoleic
20:1 !!
na
0.15
Arachidonic
20:4
1.1
0.10
Behenic
22:0
3.0
0.19
Lignoceric
24:0
na
0.14
Powder
Encapsulation
Fatty acids
Powder
Vacuum dried
7.6
12.2 - 21.0
Yellow pulp(10)
(3)
(4)
(1)
Seeds
Aril
0.2
na
45.6 - 67.2
160.0
(2)
0.4
(1)
(1)
0.9
(2)
na
Gac fruit
(2)
0.2
na
Flavonoids
18
processed to make full use of its components and maintain its quality characteristics. It is envisaged that
63.6 - 83.6
(1)
38.4 - 81.6
Polyphenolics
133287
processing would be needed. However, little information is available on how the Gac fruit might be
(3)
2.2
Vitamin E
Skin
Aril
(1)
38.4 - 141.6
!-cryptoxanthin
100
and sauces.
Pulp
(1)
Zeaxanthin
7527475
If the fruit was to be used for all the applications indicated above and more then appropriate
Lutein
Whole fruit
Gac fruit is considered as one of the super fruits, containing extraordinarily high levels of -carotene
and lycopene, and a significant amount of polyunsaturated fatty acids. Moreover, vitamin E concentration is
also comparatively high. Vitamin E, as a natural antioxidant, helps protect Gac oil from oxidation. Other
bioactive compounds including polyphenol and flavonoids are also present in Gac fruit. Those nutrients
(Tables 2 and 3) have proved to be beneficial to humans.
Lycopene
Percentage (%)
Bioactive compounds
!-carotene
Conclusions
The processing scheme of all the parts of Gac fruit including drying, oil extraction and oil encapsulation is proposed.!
The proposed processing scheme should generate products with potential to be utilised in a wide range of foods.!
The utilisation of air-dried powder from the pulp and skins prevents environmental pollution from waste disposal
problem and enhances the overall value of Gac fruit.!
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the University of Newcastle, Australia for the financial support through a PhD grant for Tuyen Kha.
References
1. Kubola J, Siriamornpun S. 2011. Food Chemistry 127(3): 1138-1145.
2. Aoki H, Kieu NTM, Kuze N, Tomisaka K, Chuyen NV. 2002. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry 66(11): 2479-2482.
3. Ishida BK, Turner C, Chapman MH, McKeon TA. 2004. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 52(2): 274-279.
4. Vuong LT, Dueker SR, Murphy SP. 2002. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 75(5): 872-879.
5. Kha TC, Nguyen MH, Roach PD, Parks SE, Stathopoulos C. 2013. Food Reviews International 29(1): 92-106. !
6. Kha TC, Nguyen MH, Roach PD. 2010. Journal of Food Engineering 98(3): 385-392.!
7. Kha TC, Nguyen MH, Roach PD. 2011. International Journal of Food Engineering 7(3).!
8. Kha TC, Nguyen MH, Roach PD, Stathopoulos CE. 2013. Journal of Food Engineering 117(4): 486-491.!
9. Kha TC, Nguyen MH, Phan DT, Roach PD, Stathopoulos CE. 2013. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.12109.!
10.Kha TC. 2010. Effects of different drying processes on the physicochemical and antioxidant properties of Gac fruit powder. The University of Newcastle,
Australia.