Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Fullick v. United States Beef, 10th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Stephanie Fullick, an employee of Arby's, filed a lawsuit against her employer alleging she was sexually harassed by another Arby's employee in violation of Title VII. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Arby's. Fullick appealed. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision, finding that Arby's was entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law based on the pleadings, depositions, and other documents submitted. The appeals court adopted the district court's reasoning in its November 6 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Fullick v. United States Beef, 10th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Stephanie Fullick, an employee of Arby's, filed a lawsuit against her employer alleging she was sexually harassed by another Arby's employee in violation of Title VII. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Arby's. Fullick appealed. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision, finding that Arby's was entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law based on the pleadings, depositions, and other documents submitted. The appeals court adopted the district court's reasoning in its November 6 order.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-09-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-5239

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Stephanie Fullick, an employee of Arby's, filed a lawsuit against her employer alleging she was sexually harassed by another Arby's employee in violation of Title VII. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Arby's. Fullick appealed. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision, finding that Arby's was entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law based on the pleadings, depositions, and other documents submitted. The appeals court adopted the district court's reasoning in its November 6 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Fullick v. United States Beef, 10th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Stephanie Fullick, an employee of Arby's, filed a lawsuit against her employer alleging she was sexually harassed by another Arby's employee in violation of Title VII. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Arby's. Fullick appealed. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision, finding that Arby's was entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law based on the pleadings, depositions, and other documents submitted. The appeals court adopted the district court's reasoning in its November 6 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    F I L E D

    United States Court of Appeals


    Tenth Circuit

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    TENTH CIRCUIT

    SEP 25 2001

    PATRICK FISHER
    Clerk

    STEPHANIE FULLICK,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,

    v.

    UNITED STATES BEEF


    CORPORATION, doing business as
    Arbys, a corporation, doing business
    as Arbys Inc.,

    No. 00-5239
    (D.C. No. 99-CV-871-E(J))
    (N. District of Oklahoma)

    Defendant - Appellee.
    ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
    Before LUCERO and McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and STAGG, ** District
    Judge.

    Plaintiff Stephanie Fullick appeals the district courts entry of summary


    judgment in favor of defendant United States Beef Corporation (Arbys).

    This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
    doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This Court
    generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order
    and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
    *

    The Honorable Tom Stagg, District Judge for the United States District
    Court for the Western District of Louisiana, sitting by designation.
    **

    Fullick, an Arbys employee, alleges that she was sexually harassed by another
    Arbys employee in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
    Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings, depositions, answers to
    interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show
    that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is
    entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). We review the
    grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the district
    court. See Sims v. Oklahoma ex rel. Dept of Mental Health & Substance Abuse
    Servs., 165 F.3d 1321, 1326 (10th Cir. 1999).
    Upon careful consideration of the record, the briefs, the district courts
    order, and applicable law, we conclude that the district court correctly decided
    this case. Therefore, for substantially the reasons stated in the district courts
    order of November 6, 2000, we AFFIRM.
    ENTERED FOR THE COURT

    Carlos F. Lucero
    Circuit Judge

    -2-

    You might also like