Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Pflum, 10th Cir. (2007)
United States v. Pflum, 10th Cir. (2007)
Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court
No. 06-3301
(D .C. N os. 06-CV -3111-SA C &
04-CR-40008-SAC)
(Kansas)
Defendant-Appellant.
ORDER *
Before M U R PHY , SE YM OU R, and M cCO NNELL, Circuit Judges.
This order is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of
the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel.
1
We liberally construe Mr. Pflums pro se application. See Hall v. Scott, 292
F.3d 1264, 1266 (10th Cir. 2002).
M r. Pflums trial took place between the two Supreme Court opinions in
Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), and United States v. Booker, 543
U.S. 220 (2005). The trial court, in an abundance of caution, submitted to the
jury all applicable sentencing factors, including the amount in taxes owed by M r.
Pflum. Accordingly, the sentencing range faced by M r. Pflum was calculated
using facts found by a jury under the reasonable doubt standard. See United
States v. Pflum, 150 Fed. Appx. 840, 841 (10th Cir. 2005).
-2-
ENTERED FOR TH E CO UR T,
Stephanie K. Seymour
Circuit Judge
-4-