Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Gomez-Lugo, 10th Cir. (2011)
United States v. Gomez-Lugo, 10th Cir. (2011)
United States v. Gomez-Lugo, 10th Cir. (2011)
February 2, 2011
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court
TENTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2104
(D. of N.M.)
JUAN GOMEZ-LUGO,
Defendant-Appellant.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,
however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th
Cir. R. 32.1.
**
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge
panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material
assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th
Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-3-
-4-
[h]e plans to live with family after he is deported as a result of the instant
criminal conduct. R., Vol. 2 at 8 (PSR). Given Gomez-Lugos awareness that
he would be deported, he cannot establish prejudice under Strickland.
III. Conclusion
After an independent review of the record, we agree that any potential issue
to be raised on appeal would be wholly frivolous. Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. We
therefore GRANT counsels motion to withdraw and DISMISS the appeal.
Entered for the Court
Timothy M. Tymkovich
Circuit Judge
-6-