Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Capitol Packing Company v. United States Secretary of Agriculture, 280 F.2d 429, 10th Cir. (1960)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views1 page
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied an application from Capitol Packing Company for leave to file a petition for a writ of prohibition against the Secretary of Agriculture. The court found that no final order from the Secretary of Agriculture was involved in the case. Additionally, the court determined that an adequate and exclusive opportunity for review of the case was already provided by law.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1960-02-02 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 280 F.2d 429 Docket: 6315

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied an application from Capitol Packing Company for leave to file a petition for a writ of prohibition against the Secretary of Agriculture. The court found that no final order from the Secretary of Agriculture was involved in the case. Additionally, the court determined that an adequate and exclusive opportunity for review of the case was already provided by law.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views1 page

    Capitol Packing Company v. United States Secretary of Agriculture, 280 F.2d 429, 10th Cir. (1960)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied an application from Capitol Packing Company for leave to file a petition for a writ of prohibition against the Secretary of Agriculture. The court found that no final order from the Secretary of Agriculture was involved in the case. Additionally, the court determined that an adequate and exclusive opportunity for review of the case was already provided by law.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    280 F.

    2d 429

    CAPITOL PACKING COMPANY et al.


    v.
    UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE.
    No. 6315.

    United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.


    Feb. 2, 1960.

    On application for leave to file a petition for a writ of prohibition.


    William R. Koger, Anthony F. Zarlengo, and Abe L. Hoffman, Denver,
    Colo., for petitioners.
    W. Richard McMartin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Denver, Colo., and Benjamin M.
    Holstein, Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
    Before BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge, and ARRAJ and STANLEY,
    District Judges.
    PER CURIAM.

    Application for leave to file petition for writ of prohibition denied on the basis
    that no final order of the Secretary of Agriculture is involved, and for the
    further reason that the application discloses that an adequate and exclusive
    opportunity for review is provided by law.

    You might also like