Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • P & B Packers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. P & B Packers, Inc., 460 F.2d 1067, 10th Cir. (1972)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case between P & B Packers, Inc. and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The NLRB found that P & B Packers violated the National Labor Relations Act by discharging an employee, Tholen, due to his union activities. P & B Packers petitioned the court to review and set aside the NLRB's order. The court denied the petition and enforced the NLRB's order, finding that the record supported the NLRB's determination that P & B Packers discharged Tholen in violation of the Act.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1972-06-20 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 460 F.2d 1067 Docket: 71-1529

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case between P & B Packers, Inc. and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The NLRB found that P & B Packers violated the National Labor Relations Act by discharging an employee, Tholen, due to his union activities. P & B Packers petitioned the court to review and set aside the NLRB's order. The court denied the petition and enforced the NLRB's order, finding that the record supported the NLRB's determination that P & B Packers discharged Tholen in violation of the Act.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    P & B Packers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. P & B Packers, Inc., 460 F.2d 1067, 10th Cir. (1972)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case between P & B Packers, Inc. and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The NLRB found that P & B Packers violated the National Labor Relations Act by discharging an employee, Tholen, due to his union activities. P & B Packers petitioned the court to review and set aside the NLRB's order. The court denied the petition and enforced the NLRB's order, finding that the record supported the NLRB's determination that P & B Packers discharged Tholen in violation of the Act.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    460 F.

    2d 1067
    80 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3041, 68 Lab.Cas. P 12,790

    P & B PACKERS, INC., Petitioner,


    v.
    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
    v.
    P & B PACKERS, INC., Respondent.
    Nos. 71-1529, 71-1634.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Tenth Circuit.
    June 20, 1972.

    Richard R. Rock, Arkansas City, Kan. (Rock & Smith, Arkansas City,
    Kan., and Thomas C. Boone, Hays, Kan., on the brief), for P & B
    Packers, Inc.
    Lawrence D. Levien, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel,
    Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Leonard M. Wagman,
    Atty., Washington, D. C., on the brief), for N.L.R.B.
    Before LEWIS, Chief Judge, and HOLLOWAY and BARRETT, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM.

    This is a petition to review and set aside an order of the National Labor
    Relations Board with a cross-application by the Board for an order of
    enforcement. The Board adopted the findings and conclusions of the trial
    examiner, 192 N.L. R.B. No. 32. The sole appellate contention of P & B
    Packers, Inc. questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support the Board's
    determination of a violation of Section 8(a) (3), National Labor Relations Act,
    29 U.S.C. Sec. 158(a) (3), in the discharge of an employee, one Tholen. We are
    satisfied that the record as a whole amply supports the Board's decision.

    The petition to set aside is denied and the order will be enforced. It is so
    ordered.

    You might also like