Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Brian K. Hatten, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    23 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Brian Hatten was convicted of a crime in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. His appointed counsel, Robert Godfrey, filed a motion to withdraw from the case, along with an Anders brief stating there were no arguable issues with merit to appeal. After reviewing the full record, the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw, affirming both Hatten's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-11-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-11531

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Brian Hatten was convicted of a crime in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. His appointed counsel, Robert Godfrey, filed a motion to withdraw from the case, along with an Anders brief stating there were no arguable issues with merit to appeal. After reviewing the full record, the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw, affirming both Hatten's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    23 views2 pages

    United States v. Brian K. Hatten, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Brian Hatten was convicted of a crime in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. His appointed counsel, Robert Godfrey, filed a motion to withdraw from the case, along with an Anders brief stating there were no arguable issues with merit to appeal. After reviewing the full record, the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw, affirming both Hatten's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 14-11531

    Date Filed: 11/18/2014

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-11531
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 6:13-cr-00264-JA-GJK-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    BRIAN K. HATTEN,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Florida
    ________________________
    (November 18, 2014)
    Before MARCUS, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 14-11531

    Date Filed: 11/18/2014

    Page: 2 of 2

    Robert Godfrey, appointed counsel for Brian Hatten, has filed a motion to
    withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
    California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
    review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of the relative merit of
    the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
    no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
    Hattens conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like