Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Eloy Valdes v. Daniel Puerto, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It involves case number 13-14810, filed on November 25, 2014, regarding plaintiff Eloy Valdes versus defendant Daniel Puerto. In a 2-page opinion, the three-judge panel affirmed the district court's denial of the defendant's motion to dismiss all counts except 15 and 16, agreeing with the reasoning provided in the lower court's Report and Recommendation and Order Adopting the Magistrate's Report.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Eloy Valdes v. Daniel Puerto, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It involves case number 13-14810, filed on November 25, 2014, regarding plaintiff Eloy Valdes versus defendant Daniel Puerto. In a 2-page opinion, the three-judge panel affirmed the district court's denial of the defendant's motion to dismiss all counts except 15 and 16, agreeing with the reasoning provided in the lower court's Report and Recommendation and Order Adopting the Magistrate's Report.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-11-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-14810

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It involves case number 13-14810, filed on November 25, 2014, regarding plaintiff Eloy Valdes versus defendant Daniel Puerto. In a 2-page opinion, the three-judge panel affirmed the district court's denial of the defendant's motion to dismiss all counts except 15 and 16, agreeing with the reasoning provided in the lower court's Report and Recommendation and Order Adopting the Magistrate's Report.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Eloy Valdes v. Daniel Puerto, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It involves case number 13-14810, filed on November 25, 2014, regarding plaintiff Eloy Valdes versus defendant Daniel Puerto. In a 2-page opinion, the three-judge panel affirmed the district court's denial of the defendant's motion to dismiss all counts except 15 and 16, agreeing with the reasoning provided in the lower court's Report and Recommendation and Order Adopting the Magistrate's Report.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 13-14810

    Date Filed: 11/25/2014

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 13-14810
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-22426-FAM

    ELOY VALDES,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, et al.,
    Defendants,
    DANIEL PUERTO,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Florida
    ________________________
    (November 25, 2014)
    Before TJOFLAT, JILL PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 13-14810

    Date Filed: 11/25/2014

    Page: 2 of 2

    On interlocutory appeal from denial of qualified immunity, the decision of


    the district court denying defendants motion to dismiss, except Counts 15 and 16,
    is affirmed on the reasoning in the thorough Report and Recommendation by the
    magistrate judge, issued on June 14, 2013, and the Order Adopting Magistrates
    Report and Recommendation, issued by the district judge on September 27, 2013.
    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like