Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Rosa Pineda Sanchez, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Rosa Pineda Sanchez was convicted of a criminal offense in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Her appointed counsel, Vernon Smith, filed a motion to withdraw from representing Sanchez on direct appeal and submitted an Anders brief stating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise. After independently reviewing the record, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals agreed there were no issues of merit and granted Smith's motion to withdraw. The court affirmed both Sanchez's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-12-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-13815

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Rosa Pineda Sanchez was convicted of a criminal offense in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Her appointed counsel, Vernon Smith, filed a motion to withdraw from representing Sanchez on direct appeal and submitted an Anders brief stating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise. After independently reviewing the record, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals agreed there were no issues of merit and granted Smith's motion to withdraw. The court affirmed both Sanchez's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    United States v. Rosa Pineda Sanchez, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Rosa Pineda Sanchez was convicted of a criminal offense in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Her appointed counsel, Vernon Smith, filed a motion to withdraw from representing Sanchez on direct appeal and submitted an Anders brief stating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise. After independently reviewing the record, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals agreed there were no issues of merit and granted Smith's motion to withdraw. The court affirmed both Sanchez's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 13-13815

    Date Filed: 12/05/2014

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 13-13815
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00319-TCB-LTW-4

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    ROSA PINEDA SANCHEZ,
    a.k.a. Rosie,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Georgia
    ________________________
    (December 5, 2014)
    Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 13-13815

    Date Filed: 12/05/2014

    Page: 2 of 2

    Vernon Smith, appointed counsel for Rosa Pineda Sanchez in this direct
    criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
    appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
    1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
    that counsels assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
    independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
    counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sanchezs conviction and
    sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like