The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Antwon Joshua Wesley's appointed counsel to withdraw from his appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the court found no arguable issues of merit and affirmed the district court's judgments revoking Wesley's supervised release and imposing the resulting sentences.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Antwon Joshua Wesley's appointed counsel to withdraw from his appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the court found no arguable issues of merit and affirmed the district court's judgments revoking Wesley's supervised release and imposing the resulting sentences.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Antwon Joshua Wesley's appointed counsel to withdraw from his appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the court found no arguable issues of merit and affirmed the district court's judgments revoking Wesley's supervised release and imposing the resulting sentences.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Antwon Joshua Wesley's appointed counsel to withdraw from his appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the court found no arguable issues of merit and affirmed the district court's judgments revoking Wesley's supervised release and imposing the resulting sentences.
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ Nos. 14-12382; 14-12383 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket Nos. 3:12-cr-00072-MCR-1; 3:13-cr-00091-MCR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff -Appellee, versus ANTWON JOSHUA WESLEY, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida ________________________ (January 26, 2015) Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-12382
Date Filed: 01/26/2015
Page: 2 of 2
Randolph P. Murrell, appointed counsel for Antwon Joshua Wesley, has
filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the judgments revoking Wesleys supervised release and imposing his resulting sentences are AFFIRMED.