Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    United States v. Julius Isoron England, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Julius Isoron England's appointed counsel, James A. Hernandez, to withdraw from representing England in his direct criminal appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed with Hernandez's assessment that there were no arguable issues of merit for appeal and affirmed both England's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Julius Isoron England, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Julius Isoron England's appointed counsel, James A. Hernandez, to withdraw from representing England in his direct criminal appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed with Hernandez's assessment that there were no arguable issues of merit for appeal and affirmed both England's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-04-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-11403

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Julius Isoron England's appointed counsel, James A. Hernandez, to withdraw from representing England in his direct criminal appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed with Hernandez's assessment that there were no arguable issues of merit for appeal and affirmed both England's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Julius Isoron England, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Julius Isoron England's appointed counsel, James A. Hernandez, to withdraw from representing England in his direct criminal appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed with Hernandez's assessment that there were no arguable issues of merit for appeal and affirmed both England's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 14-11403

    Date Filed: 04/02/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-11403
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00296-TJC-PDB-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    JULIUS ISORON ENGLAND,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Florida
    ________________________
    (April 2, 2015)
    Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 14-11403

    Date Filed: 04/02/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    James A. Hernandez, appointed counsel for Julius Isoron England in this


    direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
    appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
    1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
    that counsels assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
    independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
    counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Englands conviction and
    sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like