Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Patricia M. Styling, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    88 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The case number is 14-13815 and involves the defendant Patricia Syling. Syling's appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw representation and an Anders brief, which asserts there are no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After reviewing the record, the court agrees there are no issues of merit and grants the motion to withdraw. The court affirms both Syling's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-04-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-13815

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The case number is 14-13815 and involves the defendant Patricia Syling. Syling's appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw representation and an Anders brief, which asserts there are no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After reviewing the record, the court agrees there are no issues of merit and grants the motion to withdraw. The court affirms both Syling's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    88 views2 pages

    United States v. Patricia M. Styling, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The case number is 14-13815 and involves the defendant Patricia Syling. Syling's appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw representation and an Anders brief, which asserts there are no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After reviewing the record, the court agrees there are no issues of merit and grants the motion to withdraw. The court affirms both Syling's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 14-13815

    Date Filed: 04/07/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]


    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-13815
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00338-SDM-MAP-1
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    PATRICIA M. SYLING,
    a.k.a. Patricia Cleary Syling,
    a.k.a. Patricia Clearysyling,
    a.k.a. Patricia Cleary-Dunne,
    a.k.a. Patricia Dunne,
    a.k.a. Patricia Dunn,

    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Florida
    ________________________
    (April 7, 2015)

    Case: 14-13815

    Date Filed: 04/07/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    Before HULL, MARTIN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.


    PER CURIAM:
    Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Patricia Syling, has moved to
    withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant
    to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent
    review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of the relative merit of
    the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
    no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
    Sylings conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like