Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    United States v. Nathaniel Green, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding case number 14-13475. It states that Nathaniel Green's attorney, Susan Yazgi, has moved to withdraw from representing Green and filed a brief according to Anders v. California procedures. The three-judge panel has examined the record and found no arguable issues of merit. Therefore, the motion to withdraw is granted and Green's revocation of supervised release and resulting sentence are affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Nathaniel Green, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding case number 14-13475. It states that Nathaniel Green's attorney, Susan Yazgi, has moved to withdraw from representing Green and filed a brief according to Anders v. California procedures. The three-judge panel has examined the record and found no arguable issues of merit. Therefore, the motion to withdraw is granted and Green's revocation of supervised release and resulting sentence are affirmed.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-04-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-13475

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding case number 14-13475. It states that Nathaniel Green's attorney, Susan Yazgi, has moved to withdraw from representing Green and filed a brief according to Anders v. California procedures. The three-judge panel has examined the record and found no arguable issues of merit. Therefore, the motion to withdraw is granted and Green's revocation of supervised release and resulting sentence are affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Nathaniel Green, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding case number 14-13475. It states that Nathaniel Green's attorney, Susan Yazgi, has moved to withdraw from representing Green and filed a brief according to Anders v. California procedures. The three-judge panel has examined the record and found no arguable issues of merit. Therefore, the motion to withdraw is granted and Green's revocation of supervised release and resulting sentence are affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 14-13475

    Date Filed: 04/30/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-13475
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 3:04-cr-00206-HES-MCR-10

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    NATHANIEL GREEN,
    a.k.a. Nate,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Florida
    ________________________
    (April 30, 2015)
    Before MARTIN, KRAVITCH and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 14-13475

    Date Filed: 04/30/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    Susan Yazgi, appointed counsel for Nathaniel Green, has moved to


    withdraw from further representation of Green and filed a brief pursuant to Anders
    v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because
    independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
    counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Greens
    supervised release and imposition of his sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like