Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Delvon Lamar Williams, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Delvon Lamar Williams appealed his criminal conviction. Williams' appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed there were no meritorious issues for appeal. The court therefore granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed both Williams' conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-06-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-14007

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Delvon Lamar Williams appealed his criminal conviction. Williams' appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed there were no meritorious issues for appeal. The court therefore granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed both Williams' conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Delvon Lamar Williams, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Delvon Lamar Williams appealed his criminal conviction. Williams' appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed there were no meritorious issues for appeal. The court therefore granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed both Williams' conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 14-14007

    Date Filed: 06/11/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-14007
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 5:14-cr-00013-WTH-PRL-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    DELVON LAMAR WILLIAMS,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Florida
    ________________________
    (June 11, 2015)
    Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 14-14007

    Date Filed: 06/11/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    Craig L. Crawford, appointed counsel for Delvon Lamar Williams in this


    direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
    appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
    1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
    that counsels assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
    independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
    counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Williamss conviction and
    sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like