Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Randerson Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 11th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Randerson Rodriguez-Rodriguez appealed his conviction and sentence in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. His appointed counsel, Michael G. Smith, filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief, stating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the court agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw. The court affirmed Rodriguez-Rodriguez's convictions and sentences.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-02-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-12411

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Randerson Rodriguez-Rodriguez appealed his conviction and sentence in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. His appointed counsel, Michael G. Smith, filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief, stating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the court agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw. The court affirmed Rodriguez-Rodriguez's convictions and sentences.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Randerson Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 11th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Randerson Rodriguez-Rodriguez appealed his conviction and sentence in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. His appointed counsel, Michael G. Smith, filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief, stating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the court agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw. The court affirmed Rodriguez-Rodriguez's convictions and sentences.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 12-12411

    Date Filed: 02/08/2013

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]


    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 12-12411
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 0:11-cr-60293-DMM-3

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    RANDERSON RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Florida
    ________________________
    (February 8, 2013)
    Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Michael G. Smith, appointed counsel for Randerson Rodriguez-Rodriguez,
    has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a

    Case: 12-12411

    Date Filed: 02/08/2013

    Page: 2 of 2

    brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent
    review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of the relative merit of
    the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
    no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
    Rodriguez-Rodriguezs convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like