Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. James Jovan Ladson, 11th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding case number 12-10078. It details that Richard Klugh, the appointed counsel for James Jovan Ladson in his direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation. The court conducted an independent review of the record and found no issues of merit, so it granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed Ladson's sentences.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-10-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-10078

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding case number 12-10078. It details that Richard Klugh, the appointed counsel for James Jovan Ladson in his direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation. The court conducted an independent review of the record and found no issues of merit, so it granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed Ladson's sentences.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    United States v. James Jovan Ladson, 11th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding case number 12-10078. It details that Richard Klugh, the appointed counsel for James Jovan Ladson in his direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation. The court conducted an independent review of the record and found no issues of merit, so it granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed Ladson's sentences.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 12-10078

    Date Filed: 10/02/2012

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]


    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 12-10078
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 1:08-cr-20897-DMM-1
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    JAMES JOVAN LADSON,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    __________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Florida
    _________________________
    (October 2, 2012)
    Before WILSON, HILL and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Richard Klugh, appointed counsel for James Jovan Ladson, in this direct
    criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
    appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

    Case: 12-10078

    Date Filed: 10/02/2012

    Page: 2 of 2

    1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
    that counsels assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
    independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
    counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ladsons sentences are
    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like