Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    United States v. Shira, 11th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Tom Dale, the appointed counsel for Darren Shira in his direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and an Anders brief stating there are no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. The court's independent review of the record agrees with counsel's assessment. The motion to withdraw is granted and Shira's conviction and sentence are affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Shira, 11th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Tom Dale, the appointed counsel for Darren Shira in his direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and an Anders brief stating there are no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. The court's independent review of the record agrees with counsel's assessment. The motion to withdraw is granted and Shira's conviction and sentence are affirmed.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-04-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-14906

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Tom Dale, the appointed counsel for Darren Shira in his direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and an Anders brief stating there are no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. The court's independent review of the record agrees with counsel's assessment. The motion to withdraw is granted and Shira's conviction and sentence are affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Shira, 11th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Tom Dale, the appointed counsel for Darren Shira in his direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and an Anders brief stating there are no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. The court's independent review of the record agrees with counsel's assessment. The motion to withdraw is granted and Shira's conviction and sentence are affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    FILED
    ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    APR 4, 2011
    JOHN LEY
    CLERK

    No. 10-14906
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________

    D.C. Docket No. 6:07-cr-00036-JA-KRS-1


    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    DARREN SHIRA,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    __________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
    Middle District of Florida
    _________________________
    (April 4, 2011)
    Before MARCUS, WILSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Tom Dale, appointed counsel for Darren Shira in this direct criminal appeal,
    has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a
    brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d

    493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsels
    assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
    examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels
    motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Shiras conviction and sentence are
    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like