Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    United States v. Marquis Dargon, 11th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Marquis Dargon appealed his criminal conviction and sentencing in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Dargon's appointed counsel, Thomas H. Ostrander, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and submitted an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no meritorious issues for appeal and affirmed both Dargon's conviction and sentence. The court then granted counsel's motion to withdraw.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Marquis Dargon, 11th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Marquis Dargon appealed his criminal conviction and sentencing in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Dargon's appointed counsel, Thomas H. Ostrander, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and submitted an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no meritorious issues for appeal and affirmed both Dargon's conviction and sentence. The court then granted counsel's motion to withdraw.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-02-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-12758

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Marquis Dargon appealed his criminal conviction and sentencing in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Dargon's appointed counsel, Thomas H. Ostrander, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and submitted an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no meritorious issues for appeal and affirmed both Dargon's conviction and sentence. The court then granted counsel's motion to withdraw.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    United States v. Marquis Dargon, 11th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Marquis Dargon appealed his criminal conviction and sentencing in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Dargon's appointed counsel, Thomas H. Ostrander, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and submitted an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no meritorious issues for appeal and affirmed both Dargon's conviction and sentence. The court then granted counsel's motion to withdraw.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FILED

    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS


    ________________________
    ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    No. 08-12758
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________

    FEB 17, 2009


    THOMAS K. KAHN
    CLERK

    D. C. Docket No. 06-00349-CR-T-30-MAP


    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    MARQUIS DARGON,
    a.k.a. Pig,
    Defendant-Appellant.

    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Florida
    _________________________
    (February 17, 2009)
    Before TJOFLAT, BIRCH and HULL, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Thomas H. Ostrander, appointed counsel for Marquis Dargon in this direct

    criminal and sentencing appeal, has moved to withdraw from further


    representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
    386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of
    the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of the relative merit of the
    appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no
    arguable issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
    Dargons conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like