Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Deonte Hodge, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Deonte Hodge appealed his conviction and sentence in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Hodge's counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed there were no meritorious issues for appeal. Therefore, the court granted counsel's motion to withdraw and affirmed Hodge's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-10-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-10821

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Deonte Hodge appealed his conviction and sentence in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Hodge's counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed there were no meritorious issues for appeal. Therefore, the court granted counsel's motion to withdraw and affirmed Hodge's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Deonte Hodge, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Deonte Hodge appealed his conviction and sentence in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Hodge's counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed there were no meritorious issues for appeal. Therefore, the court granted counsel's motion to withdraw and affirmed Hodge's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 15-10821

    Date Filed: 10/30/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 15-10821
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 4:14-cr-00043-RH-CAS-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    DEONTE HODGE,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Florida
    ________________________
    (October 30, 2015)
    Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 15-10821

    Date Filed: 10/30/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    Randolph Murrell, counsel for Deonte Hodge, has moved to withdraw from
    further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
    California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
    independent review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of the
    relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
    entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is
    GRANTED, and Hodges conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like