Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Detron L. Rushing, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    30 views2 pages
    This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding case number 14-13536. It states that Detron Rushing's appointed counsel, Thomas C. Rawlings, moved to withdraw from representation and filed an Anders brief asserting there are no arguable issues of merit for appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the three-judge panel found the counsel's assessment to be correct and affirmed both Rushing's conviction and sentence. The motion to withdraw was granted.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-12-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-13536

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding case number 14-13536. It states that Detron Rushing's appointed counsel, Thomas C. Rawlings, moved to withdraw from representation and filed an Anders brief asserting there are no arguable issues of merit for appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the three-judge panel found the counsel's assessment to be correct and affirmed both Rushing's conviction and sentence. The motion to withdraw was granted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    30 views2 pages

    United States v. Detron L. Rushing, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding case number 14-13536. It states that Detron Rushing's appointed counsel, Thomas C. Rawlings, moved to withdraw from representation and filed an Anders brief asserting there are no arguable issues of merit for appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the three-judge panel found the counsel's assessment to be correct and affirmed both Rushing's conviction and sentence. The motion to withdraw was granted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 14-13536

    Date Filed: 12/16/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]


    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-13536
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 2:13-cr-00007-DHB-BKE-2
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    DETRON L. RUSHING,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    __________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Georgia
    _________________________
    (December 16, 2015)
    Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Thomas C. Rawlings, appointed counsel for Detron Rushing in this direct
    criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
    and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18
    L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

    Case: 14-13536

    Date Filed: 12/16/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because


    independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
    counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rushings conviction and
    sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like