Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Carzell Moore v. Walter D. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, 738 F.2d 1126, 11th Cir. (1984)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit holding a case in abeyance for 60 days to allow the petitioner to present claims to the courts of Georgia arising from a recent Georgia Supreme Court case. The order does not provide any details about the underlying case, but indicates it is allowing time for the petitioner to make arguments to state courts based on a new relevant precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1984-07-23 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 738 F.2d 1126 Docket: 82-8683

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit holding a case in abeyance for 60 days to allow the petitioner to present claims to the courts of Georgia arising from a recent Georgia Supreme Court case. The order does not provide any details about the underlying case, but indicates it is allowing time for the petitioner to make arguments to state courts based on a new relevant precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views1 page

    Carzell Moore v. Walter D. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, 738 F.2d 1126, 11th Cir. (1984)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit holding a case in abeyance for 60 days to allow the petitioner to present claims to the courts of Georgia arising from a recent Georgia Supreme Court case. The order does not provide any details about the underlying case, but indicates it is allowing time for the petitioner to make arguments to state courts based on a new relevant precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    738 F.

    2d 1126

    Carzell MOORE, Petitioner-Appellant,


    v.
    Walter D. ZANT, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and
    Classification Center, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 82-8683.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Eleventh Circuit.
    July 23, 1984.

    Robert E. Morin, Stephen B. Bright, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner-appellant.


    Susan Boleyn, William B. Hill, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for
    respondent-appellee.
    Case below: 722 F.2d 640.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of
    Georgia.
    Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY,
    VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT,
    ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

    BY THE COURT:
    1

    The court en banc holds this case in abeyance for a period of 60 days in order
    that petitioner may present to the courts of the State of Georgia claims he may
    have arising out of Stynchcombe v. Floyd, 252 Ga. 113, 311 S.E.2d 828 (1984).

    You might also like