Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10 views

    Martin Clement Mullen-Cofee v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 986 F.2d 1364, 11th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding an immigrant named Martin Clement Mullen-Coffee appealing his deportation order. The three judge panel amended the last sentence of the original opinion to clarify that they were affirming both the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision upholding the immigration judge's deportation order and their denial of the appellant's motion to reopen or reconsider the case. The petition for rehearing from the appellant was otherwise denied by the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Martin Clement Mullen-Cofee v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 986 F.2d 1364, 11th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views1 page
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding an immigrant named Martin Clement Mullen-Coffee appealing his deportation order. The three judge panel amended the last sentence of the original opinion to clarify that they were affirming both the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision upholding the immigration judge's deportation order and their denial of the appellant's motion to reopen or reconsider the case. The petition for rehearing from the appellant was otherwise denied by the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1993-01-06 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 986 F.2d 1364 Docket: 91-4050

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding an immigrant named Martin Clement Mullen-Coffee appealing his deportation order. The three judge panel amended the last sentence of the original opinion to clarify that they were affirming both the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision upholding the immigration judge's deportation order and their denial of the appellant's motion to reopen or reconsider the case. The petition for rehearing from the appellant was otherwise denied by the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views1 page

    Martin Clement Mullen-Cofee v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 986 F.2d 1364, 11th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding an immigrant named Martin Clement Mullen-Coffee appealing his deportation order. The three judge panel amended the last sentence of the original opinion to clarify that they were affirming both the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision upholding the immigration judge's deportation order and their denial of the appellant's motion to reopen or reconsider the case. The petition for rehearing from the appellant was otherwise denied by the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    986 F.

    2d 1364

    Martin Clement MULLEN-COFEE, Petitioner,


    v.
    IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
    Respondent.
    Nos. 90-3982, 91-4050.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Eleventh Circuit.
    Jan. 6, 1993.

    John E. Lund, Tampa, FL, for petitioner.


    Donald A. Couvillon, Patricia A. Brock, and Richard M. Evans, U.S.
    Dept. of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for
    respondent.
    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of
    Florida.
    Prior report: 976 F.2d 1375.
    ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
    Before ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, MORGAN and JOHNSON, Senior
    Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    The last sentence of the opinion is amended to read as follows:

    2 the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the BIA's decision affirming the IJ's Order
    For
    of Deportation, and the BIA's decision denying appellant's Motion to
    Reopen/Reconsider.
    3

    In all other respects, the petition for rehearing filed by petitioner is DENIED.

    You might also like