This document summarizes an order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granting a rehearing en banc for the case United States v. Jay Scott Ballinger. The order vacates the previous panel's opinion and states that the full Eleventh Circuit court will rehear the case. The order lists the judges that will participate in the rehearing.
This document summarizes an order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granting a rehearing en banc for the case United States v. Jay Scott Ballinger. The order vacates the previous panel's opinion and states that the full Eleventh Circuit court will rehear the case. The order lists the judges that will participate in the rehearing.
This document summarizes an order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granting a rehearing en banc for the case United States v. Jay Scott Ballinger. The order vacates the previous panel's opinion and states that the full Eleventh Circuit court will rehear the case. The order lists the judges that will participate in the rehearing.
v. Jay Scott BALLINGER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 01-14872. No. 01-15080.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 12, 2004.
Paul S. Kish, Fed. Pub. Def., Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Amy Levin Weil, Atlanta, GA, Christopher A. Wray, U.S. Atty., Office of Dept. Atty. Gen., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (Nos. 99-00026-CR-01-2, 01-00032-CR-01-2-WCO); William C. O'Kelley, Judge. (Opinion Nov. 21, 2002, 312 F.3d 1264, 11th Cir.2002) Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. * BY THE COURT: A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
Notes:
Honorable James C. Hill has elected to participate in further proceedings in this
Andrew J. Wagner v. Daewoo Heavy Industries America Corporation, Jack Mosler, George Valencia, David O'dell, Donald Adams, 298 F.3d 1228, 11th Cir. (2002)