Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Kelly Patrick Riggs, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    26 views2 pages
    Kelly Patrick Riggs was convicted of a crime in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. Riggs' appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw from the case, along with a brief stating there were no arguable issues with potential merit to raise on appeal. After reviewing the record, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw. As a result, Riggs' convictions and sentences were affirmed.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-01-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-11917

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Kelly Patrick Riggs was convicted of a crime in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. Riggs' appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw from the case, along with a brief stating there were no arguable issues with potential merit to raise on appeal. After reviewing the record, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw. As a result, Riggs' convictions and sentences were affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    26 views2 pages

    United States v. Kelly Patrick Riggs, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kelly Patrick Riggs was convicted of a crime in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. Riggs' appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw from the case, along with a brief stating there were no arguable issues with potential merit to raise on appeal. After reviewing the record, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw. As a result, Riggs' convictions and sentences were affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 14-11917

    Date Filed: 01/08/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]


    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-11917
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 2:12-cr-00297-KOB-JEO-1
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    KELLY PATRICK RIGGS,

    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Alabama
    ________________________
    (January 8, 2015)
    Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Brett N. Bloomston, appointed counsel for Kelly Patrick Riggs, has filed a
    motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

    Case: 14-11917

    Date Filed: 01/08/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
    review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of the relative merit of
    the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
    no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the
    defendants convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like