Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Arne Soriede, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding defendant Arne Soreide's appeal of his criminal sentence. Soreide's appointed counsel, Faith Mesnekoff, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and an Anders brief asserting there are no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. The per curiam opinion of the three-judge panel states that after independently reviewing the entire record, they agree with counsel's assessment that there are no meritorious issues for appeal, so they grant the motion to withdraw and affirm Soreide's sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-05-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-13573

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding defendant Arne Soreide's appeal of his criminal sentence. Soreide's appointed counsel, Faith Mesnekoff, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and an Anders brief asserting there are no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. The per curiam opinion of the three-judge panel states that after independently reviewing the entire record, they agree with counsel's assessment that there are no meritorious issues for appeal, so they grant the motion to withdraw and affirm Soreide's sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Arne Soriede, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding defendant Arne Soreide's appeal of his criminal sentence. Soreide's appointed counsel, Faith Mesnekoff, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and an Anders brief asserting there are no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. The per curiam opinion of the three-judge panel states that after independently reviewing the entire record, they agree with counsel's assessment that there are no meritorious issues for appeal, so they grant the motion to withdraw and affirm Soreide's sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 13-13573

    Date Filed: 05/21/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]


    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 13-13573
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 0:03-cr-60235-JIC-1
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    ARNE SOREIDE,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    __________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Florida
    _________________________
    (May 21, 2015)
    Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Faith Mesnekoff, appointed counsel for Arne Soreide in this direct criminal
    appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed
    a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d
    493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsels

    Case: 13-13573

    Date Filed: 05/21/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent


    examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels
    motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Soreides sentence is AFFIRMED.

    You might also like