Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Michael Edward Curry, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion to withdraw filed by Michael Curry's appointed counsel. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. Therefore, the court affirmed both Curry's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-07-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-15608

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion to withdraw filed by Michael Curry's appointed counsel. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. Therefore, the court affirmed both Curry's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Michael Edward Curry, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion to withdraw filed by Michael Curry's appointed counsel. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. Therefore, the court affirmed both Curry's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 14-15608

    Date Filed: 07/29/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-15608
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00018-MP-GRJ-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    MICHAEL EDWARD CURRY,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Florida
    ________________________
    (July 29, 2015)
    Before MARTIN, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 14-15608

    Date Filed: 07/29/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    Randolph Murrell and Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Michael


    Edward Curry, have filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief
    prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d
    493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsels
    assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
    review of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion to
    withdraw is GRANTED, and Currys conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like