Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 25 views

    United States v. Anissa Beth Gerwald, 11th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court filing summarizing a ruling in the case of United States v. Anaissa Beth Gerwald. It states that Gerwald's appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw from representation and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. The court's independent review found counsel's assessment to be correct, so it granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed Gerwald's convictions and sentences.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Anissa Beth Gerwald, 11th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    25 views2 pages
    This document is a court filing summarizing a ruling in the case of United States v. Anaissa Beth Gerwald. It states that Gerwald's appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw from representation and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. The court's independent review found counsel's assessment to be correct, so it granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed Gerwald's convictions and sentences.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-06-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-14891

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court filing summarizing a ruling in the case of United States v. Anaissa Beth Gerwald. It states that Gerwald's appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw from representation and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. The court's independent review found counsel's assessment to be correct, so it granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed Gerwald's convictions and sentences.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    25 views2 pages

    United States v. Anissa Beth Gerwald, 11th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court filing summarizing a ruling in the case of United States v. Anaissa Beth Gerwald. It states that Gerwald's appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw from representation and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. The court's independent review found counsel's assessment to be correct, so it granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed Gerwald's convictions and sentences.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 12-14891

    Date Filed: 06/21/2013

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]


    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 12-14891
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 4:11-cr-00249-WTM-GRS-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    ANAISSA BETH GERWALD,
    a.k.a. Anaizza Gerwald,
    a.k.a. Ann E Merraw,
    a.k.a. Ana Isabel Marraquin,
    a.k.a. Ana Isabel Garcia,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Georgia
    ________________________
    (June 21, 2013)
    Before MARCUS, WILSON and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 12-14891

    Date Filed: 06/21/2013

    Page: 2 of 2

    John E. Morrison, appointed counsel for Anaissa Beth Gerwald in this direct
    criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
    appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
    1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
    that counsels assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
    independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
    counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gerwalds convictions and
    sentences are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like