Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 25 views

    United States v. Robert LeeSean Williams, 11th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Williams was convicted of a crime in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. His appointed appellate counsel, Richard Summa, filed a motion to withdraw from the case and provided an Anders brief stating there were no arguable issues for appeal. After examining the record, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found no issues of merit and therefore granted the motion to withdraw. It also affirmed Williams's convictions and sentences.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Robert LeeSean Williams, 11th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    25 views2 pages
    Robert Williams was convicted of a crime in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. His appointed appellate counsel, Richard Summa, filed a motion to withdraw from the case and provided an Anders brief stating there were no arguable issues for appeal. After examining the record, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found no issues of merit and therefore granted the motion to withdraw. It also affirmed Williams's convictions and sentences.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-01-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-11120

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Robert Williams was convicted of a crime in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. His appointed appellate counsel, Richard Summa, filed a motion to withdraw from the case and provided an Anders brief stating there were no arguable issues for appeal. After examining the record, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found no issues of merit and therefore granted the motion to withdraw. It also affirmed Williams's convictions and sentences.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    25 views2 pages

    United States v. Robert LeeSean Williams, 11th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Williams was convicted of a crime in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. His appointed appellate counsel, Richard Summa, filed a motion to withdraw from the case and provided an Anders brief stating there were no arguable issues for appeal. After examining the record, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found no issues of merit and therefore granted the motion to withdraw. It also affirmed Williams's convictions and sentences.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 15-11120

    Date Filed: 01/11/2016

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 15-11120
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 5:14-cr-00010-RS-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    ROBERT LEESEAN WILLIAMS,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Florida
    ________________________
    (January 11, 2016)
    Before WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 15-11120

    Date Filed: 01/11/2016

    Page: 2 of 2

    Richard Summa, appointed appellate counsel for Robert Williams, has filed
    a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders
    v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Because
    independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
    counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Williamss convictions and
    sentences are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like