Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Justin Trujillo, 11th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    32 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It states that Justin Trujillo appealed his criminal conviction and sentence. His appointed counsel, Rachel Seaton, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and submitted an Anders brief, stating there were no arguable issues of merit. After reviewing the entire court record independently, the panel of judges affirmed the motion to withdraw and also affirmed Trujillo's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-04-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-11242

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It states that Justin Trujillo appealed his criminal conviction and sentence. His appointed counsel, Rachel Seaton, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and submitted an Anders brief, stating there were no arguable issues of merit. After reviewing the entire court record independently, the panel of judges affirmed the motion to withdraw and also affirmed Trujillo's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    32 views2 pages

    United States v. Justin Trujillo, 11th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It states that Justin Trujillo appealed his criminal conviction and sentence. His appointed counsel, Rachel Seaton, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and submitted an Anders brief, stating there were no arguable issues of merit. After reviewing the entire court record independently, the panel of judges affirmed the motion to withdraw and also affirmed Trujillo's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 15-11242

    Date Filed: 04/11/2016

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 15-11242
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 5:14-cr-00011-RS-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    JUSTIN TRUJILLO,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Florida
    ________________________
    (April 11, 2016)
    Before MARTIN, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 15-11242

    Date Filed: 04/11/2016

    Page: 2 of 2

    Rachel R. Seaton, appointed counsel for Justin Trujillo in this direct criminal
    appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
    filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L.
    Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
    counsels assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
    independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
    counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Trujillos conviction and
    sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like