Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Robert Holt v. J. Paul Ford, Warden, 833 F.2d 1437, 11th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Holt, a pro se plaintiff, appealed a district court ruling to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The Eleventh Circuit initially heard the case with a three-judge panel that issued a decision. However, the full Eleventh Circuit then decided to rehear the case en banc, without oral arguments. As a result, the three-judge panel's previous opinion was vacated, and the clerk was instructed to establish a new briefing schedule for the parties to submit in banc briefs to the full court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Robert Holt v. J. Paul Ford, Warden, 833 F.2d 1437, 11th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views1 page
    Robert Holt, a pro se plaintiff, appealed a district court ruling to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The Eleventh Circuit initially heard the case with a three-judge panel that issued a decision. However, the full Eleventh Circuit then decided to rehear the case en banc, without oral arguments. As a result, the three-judge panel's previous opinion was vacated, and the clerk was instructed to establish a new briefing schedule for the parties to submit in banc briefs to the full court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1987-11-24 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 833 F.2d 1437 Docket: 86-8837

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Robert Holt, a pro se plaintiff, appealed a district court ruling to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The Eleventh Circuit initially heard the case with a three-judge panel that issued a decision. However, the full Eleventh Circuit then decided to rehear the case en banc, without oral arguments. As a result, the three-judge panel's previous opinion was vacated, and the clerk was instructed to establish a new briefing schedule for the parties to submit in banc briefs to the full court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views1 page

    Robert Holt v. J. Paul Ford, Warden, 833 F.2d 1437, 11th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Holt, a pro se plaintiff, appealed a district court ruling to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The Eleventh Circuit initially heard the case with a three-judge panel that issued a decision. However, the full Eleventh Circuit then decided to rehear the case en banc, without oral arguments. As a result, the three-judge panel's previous opinion was vacated, and the clerk was instructed to establish a new briefing schedule for the parties to submit in banc briefs to the full court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    833 F.

    2d 1437

    Robert HOLT, Plaintiff-Appellant,


    v.
    J. Paul FORD, Warden, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 86-8837.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Eleventh Circuit.
    Nov. 24, 1987.

    Robert Holt, pro se.


    William F. Amideo, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga. for defendantsappellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of
    Georgia; J. Robert Elliott, Judge.
    (Opinion Oct. 5, 1987, 11 Cir., 1987, 828 F.2d 1523)
    Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE,
    KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK and
    EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

    BY THE COURT:
    1

    A majority of the judges in active service, on the Court's own motion, having
    determined to have this case reheard in banc,

    IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc
    without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a
    briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is
    hereby vacated.

    You might also like