Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Soil Clasifications Astm d2487
Soil Clasifications Astm d2487
FACT SHEET
www.com.state.oh.us
Bob Taft
Governor
Stephen K. Woltz
State Fire Marshal
Peter A. Chace
Bureau Chief
SOIL CLASSIFICATION
Effective March 31, 1999, Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) rule 1301:7-9-12 (the closure rule) and rule
1301:7-9-13 (the corrective action rule) were revised and now reference standardized methods for soil
classification. The referenced methods include ASTM D2488-90 (Description and Identification of Soils) and
the Unified Soil Classification System, which is ASTM method D2487-92 (Classification of Soils for Engineering
Purposes). These methods have been superceded by ASTM D2488-00 and ASTM D2487-00, however the
use of any of these methods is acceptable. While quantitative (laboratory) analyses are not required by BUSTR
for soil classification purposes, such analyses may be appropriate as a part of a Tier 2 Evaluation. Information
concerning ASTM methods may be located on their website at www.astm.org.
CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
Although not mandatory, BUSTR strongly recommends that an environmental professional (i.e., geologist,
engineer, or scientist), competent and experienced in soil classification, perform the required field and final site
soil classification activities. The person classifying site soil must complete and sign the BUSTR Soil
Classification Form and submit it as a part of each corresponding report.
SOIL CLASSIFICATION FIELD ACTIVITIES AND DEFAULTS
Soil classification must be based on site specific field data collected in and around the source (release) area.
Such field data may include samples collected from a tank excavation, trench, or a continuously logged soil
boring. If soil classification is not performed, or if shallow bedrock is encountered, then the soil type defaults to
the sand/gravel classification. If site soil contains extensive bedding/layering, then the most appropriate
classification(s) should be made, but with a bias toward the more permeable materials. Site soil classification
may require revision as additional soil data becomes available during the corrective action process.
COMPLETION OF THE BUSTR SOIL CLASSIFICATION FORM
Completion of the BUSTR Soil Classification Form involves the classification of site soil into one or more of the
15 ASTM soil subdivisions (e.g., GW, SP, CL, etc.). Next, the corresponding BUSTR soil classification (e.g.,
sand/gravel, silty/clayey sands, clay/silt) must be selected (see the Soil Classification Form on Page 3).
Finally, the pathway-specific classifications must be completed by identifying the ASTM subdivision (symbol)
that is applicable to each pathway (as necessary) on the lower portion of the form.
Soil Type
ML
GM
GM
Pathway
Soil to Indoor Air
GW to Indoor Air
GW Ingestion
Soil Type
GM
GM
N/A
Direct Contact: ML is selected because direct contact is expected to occur within 10 feet of the surface, where
the silty/clayey sand (ML) exists. However, soil classification becomes an issue for this pathway in the Tier 2
Evaluation.
Soil to Drinking Water Leaching: GM is selected because it is the soil type encountered between the
contaminated zone and the ground water interface, where leaching would occur.
Soil to Non-Drinking Water Leaching: The site scenario indicates that ground water is classified as drinking
water, therefore soil classification is not required. However, if ground water had been classified as not being
drinking water, then a determination for this pathway would be necessary and would be the same as that for
the Soil to Drinking Water Leaching pathway.
Soil to Indoor Air: GM is selected because in Tier 1 it is assumed that a building with a basement could be built
over a portion of a UST excavation (or other remedial excavation) previously backfilled with porous material
(e.g., pea gravel). In Tier 2, site-specific data, engineering controls, and/or deed restrictions may be used to
render this pathway incomplete.
Ground Water to Indoor Air: GM is selected for the same reasons as in the Soil to Indoor Air pathway.
Ground Water Ingestion: This pathway does not require that site soil be classified.
FURTHER EVALUATION
As a Tier Evaluation progresses, it may be necessary to more extensively evaluate site soil to secure sitespecific data for parameters such as total organic carbon, permeability, moisture content, porosity, and/or
density. This typically involves collection of soil samples via a shelby tube, and/or the performance of
quantitative testing (sieve analyses). It is important to note that the depth, location, and number of shelby
tubes taken may have a significant impact on the final results of a Tier Evaluation. Data should be collected
from several sampling locations (in both the saturated and unsaturated zones), with the more conservative
results being used in the Tier Evaluation (equations). Please note that data for certain soil parameters (e.g.,
total organic carbon) should not be collected from the source (release) area.
Letter
Symbol
Typical
Description
GW
GP
GM
Gravel and
Clean Gravels
Gravelly
Soils
(Little or No Fines)
Coarse
Grained
Gravels With
Fines
Soils
Fraction Retained on
No. 4 Sieve
(Appreciable Amount of
Fines)
GC
Sand and
Sandy Soils
Clean Sand
SW
Sands with
Fines
Fine Grained
Silts and
Clays
Sand/
(Little or no fines)
Soils
SP
SM
SC
ML
CL
OL
MH
Silts and
Clays
Pathway
Direct Contact w/soil
Soil to DW Leaching
Soil to Indoor Air
Symbol
Gravel
Soil
Silty/
Clayey
Sands
Soil
CH
OH
PT
BUSTR
Class
Clay/
Pathway
GW to Indoor Air
GW Ingestion
Soil to Non-DW Leaching
Silt
Soils
Symbol
Signature:___________________________________________________________Date:__________________