Human Rights Alert (NGO)

Joseph Zernik, PhD

PO Box 33407, Tel Aviv, Israel
Fax: 077-3179186

"
6133301 ",33407 "
Email: joseph.zernik@hra-ngo.org

2016-07-22 ROMAN ZADOROV affair: Justice Joubran is again asked to rule on

the "Jumble" in the court file... //

" ' ":

...
[]
Justice Salim Joubran is again asked to render a decision on appeal, pertaining to
denial of access to inspect the original paper decision records in Zadorov's case
under the reasoning of "Jumble" in the court file. Ukrainian citizen Roman Zadorov
is held by the Israeli authorities, purportedly serving a life imprisonment sentence
after purportedly being convicted of murder, but no valid Verdict or Sentencing
records are to be found... Top criminal defense attorney Avigdor Feldman, then
Zadorov counsel, wrote that the judgment records were lost in the wailing wind
across the Jezreel valley... The Supreme Court (and likewise the Nazareth District
Court) denies public access to inspect the authentic decision records in Zadorov's
trial court file. Instead, it presents to the public invalid electronic records. The
evidence shows close collusion, both in the Supreme Court and in the Nazareth
District Court, between the judges and senior prosecutors Mirit Stern, Shila Inbar,
and Tamar Borenstein - in perversion of Due Process and denial of access to
inspect the records. Regardless, the evidence already discovered shows that
Nazareth District Judges Yitzhak Cohen, Esther Hellman, and Haim Galpaz
perpetrated Fraud upon the Court and conducted sham/simulated trial on Roman
Zadorov. The same conduct - in an electronic court file - was documented by the
Ombudsman of the Judiciary in the Judge Varda Alshech "Fabricated Protocols"
scandal. The same conduct - in a paper court file - was also documented in the
case of Rafi Rotem v Baram and State of Israel - originating in the Tax Authority
corruption scandal. Complaint, which was filed with the UN Human Rights Council
- Arbitrary Detention Working Group and was joined by Roman Zadorov's wife, Ms
Olga Grishaev, produces indisputable evidence of the fraud by the judges in
Roman Zadorov's case. Moreover, the complaint shows that the case is not unique
at all. It reflects widespread incompetence and/or corruption of the Israeli justice
system.
http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2016/07/2016-07-22.html :
View in blog English version:
http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2016/07/2016-07-22-roman-zadorov-affair-justice.html

1/12

Figures 1: Nazareth District Court Presiding Judge Avraham Avraham denied access to inspect
the electronic signature data (evidently missing) in Roman Zadorov's electronic court file.
Magistrate Gilad Lubinsky denied access to inspect the original paper records in the Roman
Zadorov's paper court file, now held in the Supreme Court. Senior State Prosecutors Shila Inbar,
Shimrit Stern, and Tamar Borenstein collude with the judges in this matter, and it remains unclear,
who controls whom the judges the prosecutors, or the prosecutors the judges...

____

OccupyTLV,July22repeatrequestwasfiledwithSupremeCourtJustice
SalimJoubrantorenderadecisiononanappeal,pertainingtotherightto
inspectoriginalpapercourtdecisionrecordsinRomanZadorov'strial.[1]
RomanZadorovisheldbytheIsraeliauthorities,purportedlyservingalife
imprisonmentsentenceafterpurportedlybeingconvictedinthegruesome
murderof13.5girlTairRada.ButnovalidVerdict,Sentencingrecordsare
tobefound...TopcriminaldefenseAttorneyAvigdorFeldman,thenZadorov's
counsel,wrotethatthejudgmentrecordswerelostinthewailingwindacross
theJezreelvalley(whichNazarethoverlooks)...
Theappeal,nowunderreview,originatesindecisionbySupremeCourt
MagistrateGiladLubinsky,whichdeniedaccesstoinspecttheoriginaltrial
courtpaperdecisionrecordsunderthereasoningofa"jumble"inthecourt
file.[2]MagistrateLubinskydecidedthatinsteadofinspectionoftheoriginal,
authenticcourtrecords,onlyinspectionofunsigned,electronicdisplay
renditionswouldbepermitted.
TheIsraelilawinthismatterisclear.TheRegulationssay:
Everypersonispermittedtoinspectdecisionsthatarenotlawfully
prohibitedforpublication.
SupremeCourt2009JudgmentinpetitionoftheAssociationforCivilRightin
IsraelvMinisterofJusticefurtherspellsoutthatthereisnorequirementeven
tofilearequestinordertoinspectunsealeddecisionrecords.Moreover,the
Judgmentincludesnumerousloftystatementsregardingtherighttoinspect,
suchas:
...afundamentalprincipleinanydemocraticregime...
constitutional,superstatutory...
Theappealclaimsthatthereasoningofajumble"inthecourtfileisfeeble
andperplexingasanexcusefordenyingaconstitutionalright.Moreover,such
reasoningraisesseriousconcernsregardingcompetenceoftheSupremeCourt,
whichpurportedlyconductedfor5yearsanappealfromsuchcourtfile,andat
thetimeoffilingtherequesttoinspect,wasreadytoruleonarequestfora
newhearingbyanexpandedpanel...
2/12

TheappealfurtherclaimsthatMagistrateLubinsky'sconductamountsto
withholdingofevidenceofseriousFraudUpontheCourtthroughthe
conductofsham/simulatedtrialintheNazarethDistrictCourtbyJudges
YitzhakCohen,EstherHellman,andHaimGalpaz.
SuchfraudisnotuncommonintheIsraelicourtsinrecentyears:
Theappealnotesthatsimilarfraudisdocumentedinanelectroniccourt
filebyOmbudsmanoftheJudiciaryintheJudgeVardaAlshech
"FabricatedProtocols"scandal.Moreover,theOmbudsman'sdecision
documentsthatJudgeAlshech'sconductwasnotuniqueatall,andis
commonamongjudgestoday.
Theappealprovidesevidenceofsimilarfraud,whichisdocumented
throughinspectionofthepapercourtfileinthecaseofRafiRotemv
BaramandStateofIsrael.ThecaseoriginatesintheTaxAuthority
corruptionscandal.RegardingconductofthecourtsrelativetoTax
AuthoritywhistleblowerRafiRotemmediareported:"Thecourtshave
beenabusingajusticecrusaderforoveradecade".AndSupremeCourt
JusticeMazuz,thenformerAttorneyGeneral,expressedhis
disappointmentwithconductofthecourtsintheTaxAuthorityscandal
aswell...
TheappealalsonotesthatconductofSupremeCourtMagistrateLubinsky,
whodeniedaccesstotheoriginal,authenticcourtrecords,andpermittedonly
accesstounsigned,electronicdisplayrenditionsinstead,isconsideredbyfraud
expertsShellGameFraud,orConfidenceTrick.
ItshouldbenotedthatRomanZadorov'sCounsel,AttorneyYaromHaLevy,did
notobjecttotheinspection.Incontrast,MagistrateLubinskyconductedsecret
consultationwithStateProsecutorTamarBorensteinonthematter.Boththe
SupremeCourtandAttorneyBorensteinrefusetothisdatetoservethe
responsesbytheStateProsecutiononthismatter,whichwerefiledinthe
SupremeCourt,inviolationofthefundamentalsofDueProcess.Withit,one
mayguessthattheresponseswereofconspiratorialnature,likethoseofthe
NorthDistrictAttorneysintheNazarethDistrictCourt.
EventsintheNazarethDistrictCourtweresurprisinglysimilar.TheCourt
providedaccesstoinvalidelectronicrecords,butPresidingJudgeAvraham
Avrahamdeniesaccesstotheelectronicsignature(evidentlymissing)data,
whichwouldshowwhethertherecordsareauthentic,oronlydrafts(as
Israelijudgesrefertosham/simulatedcourtrecords).Theretoo,Presiding
JudgeAvrahamAvrahamconductedsecretconsultationwiththeState
Prosecutioninthismatter...(Figure2)

3/12

Figure 2: State of Israel v Roman Zadorov (502/07) in the Nazareth District Court - the secret
January 26, 2016 filing by North District Attorney Office - Attorney Shila Inbar - on request to
inspect the paper decision records (original records ) in this case.
____

AttorneyShilaInbar'ssecretivefilingintheNazarethDistrictCourtinpartsays
(Figure2):
Thenatureoftherequestsisunclear,anditappearsthat
theirpurposeistoestablishconspiracytheoriespertainingto
instantcourtfileand/orthejusticesystemingeneral...The
Requesteristryingtoabusetheterm"RighttoInspect"...The
RequesterhasnotbeenappointedOmbudsmanoftheCourts
yet...
Furthermore,NorthDistrictAttorneyMiritSterndeniedarequesttobeduly
servedAttorneyShilaInbar'sresponseunderthefalseclaimthattherequest
wasforinspectionof"investigationmaterials"...(Figure3)

4/12

Figure 3: February 21, 2016 response by North District Attorney Mirit Stern on request to duly
serve the January 26, 2016 response by North District Attorney Office - Attorney Shila Inbar - on
Pro-forma request to inspect the paper court decisions (original records) in State of Israel v
Zadorov (502/07) in the Nazareth District Court. Attorney Stern refused to duly serve the January
26, 2016 response under false pretense, that the request was for inspection of "investigation
materials". The false response was the foundation for a complaint against Attorney Mirit Stern, filed
with Commissioner of Prosecutorial Oversight Hila Gerstel.

5/12

Figure 4: State of Israel v Roman Zadorov (502/07) - Judge Avraham January 25, 2016 Decision on
Request to Inspect paper decision records (original records). The Request was conducted in patent
violation of the law, which permits inspection in previously published decision with no request
process at all, and does not provide the judges any discretion to adjudicate the matter.

____

AttorneyShilaInbar'ssecretfilingintheNazarethDistrictCourt(Figure2)
alsoapprovesofJudgeAvraham'spreviousdecisiontodenyaccessinRequest
No120(Figure4).
RequestNo120pertainedtoattempttoexercisetherighttoinspect"lawfully
madearrestwarrant"and"lawfullymadejudgmentdocket".JudgeAvraham's
Decisionsays:
...thesearenotrequeststoinspect,butaninvestigationbythe
RequesterofthevalidityandoperationsofNetHaMishpatsystem
andvariousotherclaimsrelativetoconductofthejudicialpanel
ininstantcourtfile.Insuchmatters,thisCourtshallnotengage...
Incredibly,allthefundamentalsofvalidcourttrialaremissinginthiscase...
TherelationshipsbetweenthecourtandtheStateProsecution,bothin
NazarethandintheSupremeCourtshowclosecollusion,butraisequestions
astowhocontrolsthesituation:Thejudges,ortheprosecutors...
RegardlessofconductoftheNazarethDistrictCourtandtheSupremeCourt,
theevidencewhichhassofarbeendiscoveredshowsthatJudgesYitzhak
Cohen,EstherHellmanandHaimGalpazconductedasham/simulatedtrialon
RomanZadorovintheNazarethDistrictCourt.
ComplaintwasfiledwiththeUNHumanRightsCouncilWorkingGroupon
ArbitraryDetention,andwasjoinedbyRomanZadorov'swifeOlga
Grishaev.[3,4]Thecomplaintconcludes:
RomanZadorovisarbitrarilydetainedbytheIsraeliPrisonServicewith
nolawfullymadeArrestDecree.
RomanZadorov'strialbytheNazarethDistrictCourtshouldbedeemed
sham/simulatedprocessdeprivationofDueProcessandFairand
PublicHearingwhichendedwithneitherlawfulVerdictnor
Sentencingrecord.
RomanZadorov'sappealintheIsraeliSupremeCourtshouldbedeemed
lackinginauthorityandvalidityfromstarttoendoriginatingwithno
validjudgmentrecordsofthelowercourt,conductedwithnovalid
recordsofthehearings,andwherealldecisionsrecordsareofdubious
validity.
RomanZadorov'sdetentionbytheIsraeliauthoritiesallegedlyviolates
articlesoftheUniversalDeclarationofHumanRights,theInternational
CovenantonCivilandPoliticalRights,originatesinDiscrimination
basedonNationality,Language,and/orReligion,andininadvertent
politicalreasons.
RomanZadorov'scasereflectswidespreadincompetenceand/or
corruptionoftheIsraelijusticesystem,includingitshighestechelons,to
alevelthatwouldberecognizedincriminologyas"OrganizedState
6/12

Crime".
TheRomanZadorovcaseinIsraelisamirrorimageoftheMendelBeilisaffair
]intheUkraineacenturyago...[5
LINKS
[1] Zernik v Zadorov and State of Israel (4650/16) in the Supreme Court - repeat request for
rendering a decision
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8Aa2xQGbmk5REZIOWlSekY4STA/view?usp=sharing
[2] 2016-06-09 Zernik v Zadorov and State of Israel (4650/16) in the Supreme Court appeal of
Magistrate decision
) (4650/16 092016 ,
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8Aa2xQGbmk5TkFObVRmb2FNMkU/view?usp=sharing
[3] 2016-07-11 In RE: Roman Zadorov - Ukrainian citizen detained in Israel - complaint and request
for investigation by the UN HRC Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5YTcxZGJENnN1QmM
[4] 2016-07-14 Supplemental letter - Ms Olga Grishaev joins the complaint
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8Aa2xQGbmk5UmpTN3A1aGdwX3c/view?usp=sharing
[5] 2016-07-12 ROMAN ZADOROV - the Israeli Mendel Beilis_OpEdNews.com
http://www.opednews.com/articles/ROMAN-ZADOROV--the-Israel-by-Joseph-Zernik-Israel_JudicialCorruption-160712-535.html

2016-07-22 : ' ""

...
' ,
, , "" .
,
" . ..." ,
, ...
) (
)( . ,
.
- , , -
. , - ,
, - / .
- -
" " . - -
- .
- -
" ,
. , , - /
.
...
http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2016/07/2016-07-22.html :
View in blog English version: http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2016/07/2016-07-22-roman-zadorov-affair-justice.html

7/12

 :1 )
( .
"" , ' . , ,
, , ,
...

____

" 22 , '
,
[1] . , ,
" .
..." , - ,
...

, ,
, "" .
, , [2] .
. :
.
" 2009 -
. ,
, -
... ... , ...
""
. , ,
5 ... ,
...

- / , ,
.
:
- -
" " . ,
,
.
- -
. .
, " " .
, ,
...
, -
, )( , , ,

8/12

 ) - (RENDITION "
" , " ".
," . ,
.
,
. ,
,
...
...
,
) ( , .
) . (2

:2 ) - (502/07 26,2016 ,
," , )
( , 26.2016 ,
____

9/12

 " :
,
/ ...
" " ...
"...
,
. ,
" ") ... (3

:3 ," , 21 ,2016 ,
)(520/07
." 26,2016 ,
, " " . "
. , , ...

____

"
,):(4

10/12

,'
25.01.2016'.120

:4 )- (502/07 25 ,2016 ,
. , " "
, .

__________

120 " " "

" . :
... ,
-
" . ...
,
,
/ .
" , ,
- [3,4] :
-
.

/ - -
.

-
, ,
.

11/12

 . , ,,
.
- /
- - "
".
[5] .

] [1 ) (4650/16 -

?https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8Aa2xQGbmk5REZIOWlSekY4STA/view
usp=sharing
] [2 ) (4650/16 092016 ,

?https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8Aa2xQGbmk5TkFObVRmb2FNMkU/view
usp=sharing
] 2016-07-11 [3 - -
".

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5YTcxZGJENnN1QmM
] 2016-07-14 [4 -'

?https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8Aa2xQGbmk5UmpTN3A1aGdwX3c/view
usp=sharing
] 2016-07-12 [5 -

http://www.opednews.com/articles/ROMAN-ZADOROV--the-Israel-by-JosephZernik-Israel_Judicial-Corruption-160712-535.html

12/12