Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Oral Presentation Assessment Example
Oral Presentation Assessment Example
GroupNumber:__1_
Foreachcriteria,thegroupandthestudentwillbeassessedoutof5usingthefollowingscale
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
Excellent
1
2
3
4
5
GroupAssessment(50%)
Description
Marks
(a)
Wastheintroductioneffectiveandinformative?
Wastheoverallpresentationwellorganizedandeasytofollow?
Wasthetechnicalcontentgood,includingclearandjustifiableassumptions,methodology,relevant
conclusions,etc?
Werethekeypointsandquestionsofthecasestudyclearlystated?
Werethevisualaids,e.g.,slides,overheads,etc.,wereclear,effectiveandwellused?
Wasthespeakersbehavior,volume,andmannerofspeakingwereeffectiveandclear?
Weretheconclusionsand/orrecommendationsdrewthingstogetherwell?
Weretheteachersquestionswerehandledwell?
GROUPOVERALLGRADE:___________
TeamMemberAssessment(50%)
TeamMember
VictorJulioEspinozaValverde(D)
GladysAnitaSanaviaTasayco
RuthHuarcayaChacon
BlancaGarciaShiraishi
CarolinaMateoJurado
AnaKatiaBarbozaRosado
Quality(b)
FinalMark
(knowledge,clarity
andexplanation)
(0.5*a+0.5*b)*4
1
2
3
4
5
GroupAssessment(50%)
Description
Marks
(a)
Wastheintroductioneffectiveandinformative?
Wastheoverallpresentationwellorganizedandeasytofollow?
Wasthetechnicalcontentgood,includingclearandjustifiableassumptions,methodology,relevant
conclusions,etc?
Werethekeypointsandquestionsofthecasestudyclearlystated?
Werethevisualaids,e.g.,slides,overheads,etc.,wereclear,effectiveandwellused?
Wasthespeakersbehavior,volume,andmannerofspeakingwereeffectiveandclear?
Weretheconclusionsand/orrecommendationsdrewthingstogetherwell?
Weretheteachersquestionswerehandledwell?
GROUPOVERALLGRADE:___________
TeamMemberAssessment(50%)
TeamMember
CarlosVelaRuiz(D)
VanessaTorres
MariaDelgado
BeatrizQuijanoAranda
IndiraOjedaSaico
Quality(b)
FinalMark
(knowledge,clarity
andexplanation)
(0.5*a+0.5*b)*4
1
2
3
4
5
GroupAssessment(50%)
Description
Marks
(a)
Wastheintroductioneffectiveandinformative?
Wastheoverallpresentationwellorganizedandeasytofollow?
Wasthetechnicalcontentgood,includingclearandjustifiableassumptions,methodology,relevant
conclusions,etc?
Werethekeypointsandquestionsofthecasestudyclearlystated?
Werethevisualaids,e.g.,slides,overheads,etc.,wereclear,effectiveandwellused?
Wasthespeakersbehavior,volume,andmannerofspeakingwereeffectiveandclear?
Weretheconclusionsand/orrecommendationsdrewthingstogetherwell?
Weretheteachersquestionswerehandledwell?
GROUPOVERALLGRADE:___________
TeamMemberAssessment(50%)
TeamMember
MiguelPrimodelaTorre
CarlosJassoGarcia
OdalisInguanseVizcarra
Quality(b)
FinalMark
(knowledge,clarity
andexplanation)
(0.5*a+0.5*b)*4
KarlyNavarroCotrina
MarisolJaureguiGomez
1
2
3
4
5
GroupAssessment(50%)
Description
Marks
(a)
Wastheintroductioneffectiveandinformative?
Wastheoverallpresentationwellorganizedandeasytofollow?
Wasthetechnicalcontentgood,includingclearandjustifiableassumptions,methodology,relevant
conclusions,etc?
Werethekeypointsandquestionsofthecasestudyclearlystated?
Werethevisualaids,e.g.,slides,overheads,etc.,wereclear,effectiveandwellused?
Wasthespeakersbehavior,volume,andmannerofspeakingwereeffectiveandclear?
Weretheconclusionsand/orrecommendationsdrewthingstogetherwell?
Weretheteachersquestionswerehandledwell?
GROUPOVERALLGRADE:___________
TeamMemberAssessment(50%)
TeamMember
Quality(b)
FinalMark
(knowledge,clarity
andexplanation)
EdithLeonSilvera
JazminEspinozaGutierrez
RicardoBellidoLinares
JessicaUrdialesCrisoul
FabrizioVillarH.
(0.5*a+0.5*b)*4