Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cannilla2010 PDF
Cannilla2010 PDF
CNR-ITAE Nicola Giordano, Salita S. Lucia sopra Contesse, 5, I-98126, Messina, Italy
Dip. di Chimica Industriale ed Ing. Materiali, Universit di Messina, Salita Sperone 31, I-98166, Messina, Italy
Dip. di Scienze Chimiche, Universit di Cagliari-CSGI, Cittadella Universitaria, S.S. 554 bivio Sestu, 09042 Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 25 February 2010
Received in revised form 14 April 2010
Accepted 15 April 2010
Available online 4 May 2010
Keywords:
Biodiesel
Transesterication reaction
Heterogeneous (liquidsolid) catalysis
Ceriamanganese catalysts
a b s t r a c t
This paper reports the results obtained using a novel MnCeOx system in the transesterication reaction
of rened sunower oil with methanol. The performance of such catalysts has been compared with that
of common acid supported catalysts. Results obtained revealed that MnCeOx system possesses a superior
activity especially by operating at low temperatures (120 C). Independently of Mn loading, the redoxprecipitation method for the preparation of Mn-based systems allowed to obtain always high dispersed
catalysts and, as a consequence, a linear relationship between reaction rate and Mn loading was obtained.
NH3 -TPD and CO2 -TPD measurements indicate that MnCeOx systems are characterized by a prevalent
nature of basic sites. However, the catalyst performance is the result of a synergic role played by both
the surface acid/base character and textural porosity.
2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Biodiesel is an environmentally friendly, non-toxic, biodegradable mixture, which can be used either as alternative pure fuel
or for blending with conventional oil-derived fractions [1]. Since
biodiesel is produced from renewable vegetable sources, overall well-to-wheel CO2 emissions are lower, thus reducing the
contribution to the greenhouse effect [2]. The physico-chemical
characteristics of biodiesel are similar to those of the fossil diesel
fuel in terms of energy density, cetane number and phase change,
while it is characterized by a higher ash point value. Moreover, a
superior oxygen content (1011%) improves the combustion efciency and the lubricant properties, the last contributing to reduce
the engine stress and maintenance [1,3].
Biodiesel consists of long-chain fatty acid alkyl esters (FAAEs),
obtained by transesterication reaction of triacylglycerides (TGs)
with alcohols. Depending upon the climate and environmental
conditions, several countries are looking for different sources of
vegetable oils [1]; soybean oil in the United States and Brazil [48],
rapeseed [9,10] and sunower [11,12] oil in Europe, palm oil [13]
and coconut oil [14] in the Asian countries. Cotton oil [15], safower
[16], canola [17], jatropha [18], brassica carinata oil [19] and waste
grease [3,20] are also considered as potential biodiesel feedstock.
Corresponding author at: CNR-ITAE Nicola Giordano, Salita S. Lucia sopra Contesse, 5, I-9816, Messina, Italy.
E-mail address: Francesco.Frusteri@itae.cnr.it (F. Frusteri).
0926-860X/$ see front matter 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2010.04.031
(1)
(2)
(3)
All the above reactions are reversible and then an excess of alcohol
is used to obtain high yields (>99%) of methyl esters (MEs) that also
allow an easier separation of ME from glycerol [2]. Reaction temperature, pressure, alcoholoil molar ratio, water and free fatty acids
(FFAs) content are the main parameters affecting the efciency of
the process. However, a limited solubility of TGs in the alcoholic
Composition (wt.%)
Palmitic (C16:0)
Stearic (18:0)
Oleic (C18:1)
Linoleic (C18:2)
Linolenic (C18:3)
Arachidate (C20:2)
6.8
3.8
27.1
61.1
0.2
0.3
159
Table 2
Physico-chemical properties of the solid acid systems.
Catalyst
SABET (m2 g1 )
PV (cm3 g1 )
APDa ()
Acidityb (mmolH+ g1 )
HPW-17
HPMo-17
Cs-HPW
NS-20
200
264
207
187
0.62
0.46
0.80
0.52
124
70
155
111
0.74
1.13
0.81
0.92
a
b
460
365
360
240
271
237
187
N.D.
36.9
64.0
N.D.
N.D.
68
133
191
314
74
25
0.42
0.59
0.73
0.90
0.2
0.1
a
173
150
143
124
92
89
0.54
1.70
5.20
10.9
19.3
25.4
41.0
0.41
0.87
1.29
3.40
Mn0.3 Ce0.7
Mn0.4 Ce0.6
Mn0.5 Ce0.5
Mn0.7 Ce0.3
MnO2
CeO2
Acidity
APD ()
PV (cm3 g1 )
SABET (m2 g1 )
K (wt.%)
Mn (wt.%)
Mnat /Ceat
Catalyst
Table 3
Physico-chemical and acidbasic properties of MnCeOx systems along with bulk MnO2 and CeO2 samples.
1.1
0.3
0.5
Surface (molNH3 m
Basicity
2.3.2. Surface area (SABET ), pore volume (PV) and pore size
distribution (PSD)
Surface area, pore volume and pore size distribution were
determined from the nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms
at 196 C, using a Carlo Erba (Sorptomatic Instruments CE Series)
gas adsorption device. Before analysis, all samples were outgassed
at 120 C under vacuum for 2 h. The isotherms were elaborated
according to the BET method for surface area calculation, with
the HorwarthKavazoe (HK) and BarrettJoynerHalenda (BJH)
methods used for the evaluation of micropore and mesopore distributions, respectively.
2.7
2.4
2.5
1.9
2.9
2.6
Surface (molCO2 m
2.4
8.3
3.8
B/Aa ratio
160
Fig. 1. PSD of the MnCeOx systems: inuence of the Mn/Ce atomic ratio.
161
Fig. 3. Deconvolution plot of the CO2 -TPD proles in the range of 0350 C.
amount of sunower oil (80 g) was charged into the reactor, adding
44 mL of methanol, which corresponds to a MeOH/oil molar ratio
(Rmet /oil) of 12. Methanol was previously mixed with the catalyst, in
order to operate with a concentration of 1 wt.% of catalyst referred
to the oil. The reactor was preliminarily ushed under a nitrogen
ow to remove the air and heated up to the reaction temperature
(ca. 15 min). At the end of the run, the reactor was cooled down to
room temperature by putting it into an ice-bath, thus allowing all
the gas-phase components to be condensed. Then, the reactor was
opened and the catalyst separated by centrifugation and ltration.
The reaction mixture, after the evaporation of unreacted methanol,
resulted to be composed by a top layer containing oil and methyl
esters products and a bottom layer of glycerol that were further
separated by centrifugation.
According to the EN 14103 method suitable for analysis of
methyl esters C14 C24 , the reaction mixture was analyzed off-line,
by a gas chromatograph HP 7890N, provided with a capillary column HP Innowax (l, 30 m; i.d., 0.32 m; lm thickness, 0.25 m)
and a ame ionization detector (FID), using He as carrier gas. The
following temperature program was adopted for the separation
of the various compounds: 9 min at 210 C; from 210 to 230 C
(with a heating rate of 20 C min1 ) and 230 C for 10 min. The
samples (1 l) were injected in split mode (split ratio of 80:1)
into the GC using an automatic sampler Agilent 7683B Series, each
conversion-selectivity data set being calculated from the average of
three independent measurements with an accuracy of 1%. Methyl
palmitate, methyl stearate, methyl oleate, methyl linoleate, methyl
linolenate and methyl arachidate were used as chemical GC standards for analysis calibration. The biodiesel analysis was carried
out dissolving 50 mg of sample into 1 mL of methyl heptadecanoate
solution (internal standard).
The yield to biodiesel was calculated from the content of methyl
esters analyzed by the following equation:
Yield (%) = 100
molME
3 moloil
162
Table 4
Basic sites distribution evaluated on the basis of CO2 -TPD proles.
Catalyst
Mn0.3 Ce0.7
Mn0.4 Ce0.6
Mn0.5 Ce0.5
Mn0.7 Ce0.3
Weak (T1 , 93 C)
0.85
0.83
0.38
0.35
0.90
0.93
0.96
0.78
0.90
0.93
1.17
0.81
67
69
85
82
Fig. 5. ME yield (%) with differently functionalized solid catalysts: sunower oil
weight, 80 g; Rmet/oil , 12 mol/mol; Rcat/oil , 1 wt.% (3 wt.% for ZnO); TR , 200 C; reaction
time, 5 h.
163
Fig. 6. Oil conversion and ME yield as a function of reaction temperature: Mn0.5 Ce0.5
catalyst; sunower oil weight, 80 g; Rmet/oil , 12 mol/mol; Rcat/oil , 1 wt.%; reaction time,
5 h.
(ME yield of about 10%) than that observed in presence of catalyst. The methyl esters yield of the commercial ZnO sample (Rcat/oil ,
3 wt.%) is comparable with literature data (75%) under analogous
reaction conditions [44], while the activity scale of the supported
and precipitated systems, in terms of ME yield, resulted to be the
following:
Mn0.5 Ce0.5 > HPMo-17 > HPW-17 > NS-20 > Cs-HPW
indicating that the Mn0.5 Ce0.5 sample ensured the best catalytic
performance. It is important also to underline that with such a catalyst, an easier separation of the reaction products at the end of run
(clean solution) was allowed. However, the results conrmed that
the typical solid acidic systems (HPW-17 and HPMo-17 samples)
also exhibit a considerable transesterication activity due to the
presence of surface Brnsted acid sites [46,47].
The preliminary screening of the different catalytic systems
prompted us to shed light into the behaviour pattern of the novel
MnCeOx systems and factors affecting a potential process development based on their use.
The effect of the reaction temperature on biodiesel yield in the
range of 120200 C, using Mn0.5 Ce0.5 , catalyst is shown in Fig. 6.
As expected, the ME yield increases with reaction temperature. In
addition the higher temperature mitigated the interphase diffusion
phenomena favouring a better mixing of the two phases, alcohol
and oil [17]. It is important to observe that, the reaction proceeds
with a signicant rate even at 120 C obtaining an oil conversion of
ca. 40% and a ME yield of 37%. Considering the low Rcat/oil (1 wt.%)
used, in comparison to higher ratios normally used in similar exper-
Fig. 7. Inuence of reaction time on oil conversion and methyl esters yield [A]; reaction kinetics for Mn0.5 Ce0.5 catalyst [B]. Sunower oil weight, 80 g; Rmet/oil , 12 mol/mol;
Rcat/oil , 1 wt.%; TR , 140 C.
164
Fig. 10. Correlation among textural or surface properties with catalytic data (TR ,
140 C; reaction time, 1 h) of the Mn-based systems.
165
Table 5
Inuence of K content on the catalyst performance.
Catalyst
K (wt.%)
a
Mn0.5 Ce0.5 m
Mn0.5 Ce0.5
Mn0.7 Ce0.3 eb
Mn0.7 Ce0.3 wc
Mn0.7 Ce0.3
a
b
c
1.7
1.7
4.3
5.2
Mn (wt.%)
5.5 10
7.9 104
1.1 103
2.3 103
2.9 103
25
25
41
41
41
ME yield (%)
10
15
20
40
50
4. Conclusions
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
166
[32] M.D. Serio, M. Cozzolino, R. Tesser, P. Patrono, F. Pinzari, B. Bonelli, E. Santacesaria, Appl. Catal. A 320 (2007) 17.
[33] K. Narasimharao, D.R. Brown, A.F. Lee, A.D. Newman, P.F. Siril, S.J. Tavener, K.
Wilson, J. Catal. 248 (2007) 226234.
[34] S.M. De Rezende, M.D. Castro Reis, M.C. Reid, P.L. Silva Jr., F.M.B. Coutinho, R.A.
da Silva San Gil, E.R. Lachter, Appl. Catal. A 349 (2008) 198203.
[35] X.R. Chen, Y.H. Ju, C.Y. Mou, J. Phys. Chem. C 111 (2007) 1873118737.
[36] D.G. Cantrell, L.J. Gillie, A.F. Lee, K. Wilson, Appl.Catal. A 287 (2005) 183190.
[37] R. Stern, G. Hillion, J.J. Rouoxel, S. Leport, Institute Francais de Petrole , US Patent
5,908,946 (1999).
[38] T. Nishimura, T.M. Okuhara, M. Mison, Appl. Catal. 73 (1991) L7.
[39] F. Arena, R. Dario, A. Parmaliana, Appl. Catal. A 170 (1998) 127137.
[40] F. Arena, G. Truno, J. Negro, B. Fazio, L. Spadaro, Chem. Mater. 19 (9) (2007)
22702276.
[41] K. Tanabe, in: B. Imelik, C. Naccashe, G. Goudurie, Y. Ben Taarit, J.C. Vedrine
(Eds.), Catalysis by Acids and Bases, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1985, pp. 114.
[42] S. Bancquart, C. Vanhove, Y. Pouilloux, J. Barrault, Appl. Catal. A 218 (2001)
111.
[43] F. Arena, G. Truno, J. Negro, L. Spadaro, Appl. Catal. B 85 (2008) 4047.
[44] R. Craciun, Solid State Ionics 110 (1998) 8393.
[45] X. Zheng, S. Wang, X. Wang, S. Wang, X. Wang, A. Wu, Mater. Lett. 59 (2005)
27692773.
[46] A. Alsalme, E.F. Kozhevnikova, I.V. Kozhevnikov, Appl. Catal. A 349 (2008)
170176.
[47] J. Ni, F.C. Meunier, Appl. Catal. A 333 (2007) 122130.
[48] J. Shen, M. Tu, C. Hu, J. Solid State Chem. 137 (1998) 295301.
[49] D. Darnoko, M. Cheryan, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 77 (2000) 12631267.