TEACHING AND LEARNING TOOL BOX

Book Sources
Anderson, L., Cruikshank, K., Mayer, R., Pintrich, P., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. (2001). A
taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. New York: David McKay
Company.
Chatterji, M. (2003). Designing and using tools for educational assessment. Boston, MA:
Allyn & Bacon.
Huba, M., & Freed, J. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses.
Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (1998). Active learning: Cooperation in the
college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2004). Models of teaching. Boston, MA: Allyn &
Bacon.
Kolb, D. (1999). Learning style inventory. Experience based learning systems. Boston,
MA: Hay/McBen Training Resource Group.
Nilson, L. (2003). Teaching at its best. Boston, MA: Anker Publishing Company.
Nitko, A. (2004). Educational assessment of students. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
Education.
Rogers, G. (2002). Alternative assessment methods: Beyond tests.
Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA:
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Book Chapters, Articles, and Conference Sources
Alva, K. (2000). Assessment to promote deep learning. A conversation with Jorge Klor de
Alva. Fort Collins, CO: American Association for Higher Education.
Angelo, T., & Cross, P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
Anderson, J. (2000). Developing a learning/teaching style assessment model for diverse
populations. In Assessment to Promote Deep Learning. Fort Collins, CO:
American Association for Higher Education.

Anderson, R., & Speck, B. (1998a). Designing and grading written assignment. In
Changing the way we grade student performance: Classroom assessment and the
new learning paradigm. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Anderson, R., & Speck, B. (1998b). Evaluating technology-based process and products.
In Changing the way we grade student performance: Classroom assessment and
the new learning paradigm. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Anderson, R., & Speck, B. (1998c). Grading classroom participation. In Changing the
way we grade student performance: Classroom assessment and the new learning
paradigm. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Anderson, R., & Speck, B. (1998d). Portfolios: Purposeful collections of student work. In
Changing the way we grade student performance: Classroom assessment and the
new learning paradigm. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Anderson, R. & Speck, B. (1998e). Unveiling Some of the Mystery of Professional
Judgment in Classroom Assessment. In Changing the way we grade student
performance: Classroom assessment and the new learning paradigm. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Anderson, R. & Speck, B. (1998f). Why talk about ways to grade? The shift from
traditional assessment to alternative assessment. In Changing the way we grade
student performance: Classroom assessment and the new learning paradigm. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Banta, T. (2001). Assessing competence in higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Balcazar, Y., Damacela, L., & Portillo, N. (2003). Experiences of differential treatment
among college students of color. Journal of Higher Education, 74,429-444.
Baron, M., & Boschee, F. (1995). Authentic assessment. Lancaster, PA.: Technomic
Publishing.
Biggs, J. (2000). Assessing for quality in learning. In Assessment to promote deep
learning. Fort Collins, CO: American Association for Higher Learning.
Borden, V. (2000). A few good measures: The impossible dream. In Assessment to
promote deep learning. Fort Collins, CO: American Association for Higher
Education
Brown, J. (2000). Growing up digital. How the web changes work, education, and the
ways people learn. Change.
Bussler, D. (2005). Democratic circles. In The coolest school in America. Oxford:
EdVisions.

Cambridge, B. (1999). The scholarship of teaching and learning: A national initiative.

American Association for Higher Education.
Campbell, W., & Smith, K. (1997). For openers: An inclusive course syllabus. In New
paradigms for college teaching. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Crombie, G., Pyke, S., & Silverthorn, N. ( 2003). Students perceptions of their classroom
anticipation and instructor as function of gender and context. Journal of Higher
Education, 74, 50-79.
Dann, R. (2002). Assessment as learning. In Promoting assessment as learning. New
York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
Danserau, D., & Newbern, D. (1997). Using knowledge maps to enhance teaching. In
New paradigms for college teaching. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Dominowski, R. (2002a). Grading systems. In Teaching undergraduates. NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Dominowski, R. (2002b). Learning and remembering. In Teaching undergraduates. NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dominowski, R. (2002c) A planning timetable. In Teaching undergraduates. NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dominowski, R. (2002d). Teaching thinking. In Teaching undergraduates. NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Donald, J. (2002a). Hard thinking. In Teaching undergraduates. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Donald, J. (2002b). Inductive thinking. Teaching undergraduates. NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Donald, J. (2002c). Learning to think. In Learning to think: Disciplinary perspectives.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Donald, J. (2002d). Learning, understanding, and meaning. In Teaching undergraduates.
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Donald, J. (2002e). Orderly thinking. In Teaching undergraduates. NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Entwistle, N. (2000). Promoting deep learning through teaching and assessment. In
Assessment to promote deep learning. Fort Collins, CO: American Association
for Higher Education.

Ewell, P., & Lopez, C. (2000). Assessment at the Millennium. In Assessment to promote
deep learning. Fort Collins, CO: American Association for Higher Education.
Facione, P. (1994). Holistic critical thinking scoring rubric. San Francisco: California
Academic Press.
Farquharson, A. & Styve, S. (1995). Self assessment of teaching/facilitating skills. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Felder, R., & Silverman, L. (1988). Learning and teaching styles. Engineering Education
78, 674-681.
Felder, R., & Wankat, P. (1994). The scholarship of teaching and learning in
engineering. In M.T. Huber and S. Morreale (Eds.). Discipline Styles in the
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Exploring Common Ground. Washington:
AAHE.
Forsyth, D. (2004). The professors guide to teaching: Psychological principles and
practices. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Frye, B. (1994). Planning student evaluation, Constructing tests and grading. In
Teaching in college. Cleveland, OH: Info-Tec.
Golding, J. (2001). Teaching the large lecture class. In Teaching tips. Needham Heights,
MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Guiffrida, D. (2005). Othermothing as a framework for understanding African American
students definitions of student-centered faculty. Journal of Higher Education, 76,
701-723.
Hein, T., & Budny, D. (1999). Teaching to students learning styles: Approaches that
work. San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Hein, T., & Budny, D. (1999). Teaching and learning with style: Classroom approaches
for science and engineering educators. San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Horgan, J. (2002). Lecturing for Learning. In Learning to think: Disciplinary
perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ignelzi, M. (2000). Meaning-making in the learning and teaching process. In Teaching to
promote. Austin, TX: Jossey-Bass.
Joyce, B., & Calhoun, E. (1996). Creating learning experiences: The role of instructional
theory and research. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and
Curriculum Development.

Killian, D. (1995). Stalking the superior syllabus. In Teaching within the rhythms of the
semester. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Knowlton, D., & Sharp, D. (1990a). Designing problems to promote higher-order
thinking. In Problem-based learning in the information age. San Francisco, CA:
Wiley Periodicals.
Knowlton, D., & Sharp, D. (1990b). Exploring the tensions of problem-based learning:
Insights from research. In Problem-based learning in the information age. San
Francisco, CA: Wiley Periodicals.
Knowlton, D., & Sharp, D. (1990c). Fostering collaboration among students in problembased learning. In Problem-based learning in the information age. San
Francisco, CA: Wiley Periodicals.
Knowlton, D., Sharp, D. (1990d). Guiding students toward solutions in field experiences.
In Problem-based learning in the information age. San Francisco, CA: Wiley
Periodicals.
Knowlton, D., & Sharp, D. (1990e). Heuristics and problem solving. In Problem-based
learning in the information age. San Francisco, CA: Wiley Periodicals.
Knowlton, D., & Sharp, D. (1990f). Integrating computers into the problem-solving
process. In Problem-based learning in the information age. San Francisco, CA:
Wiley Periodicals.
Knowlton, D., & Sharp, D. (1990g). Preparing students for educated living: Virtues of
problem-based learning across the higher education curriculum. In Problembased learning in the information age. San Francisco, CA: Wiley Periodicals.
Knowlton, D., & Sharp, D. (1990h). Problem solving through design. In Problem-based
learning in the information age. San Francisco, CA: Wiley Periodicals.
Knowlton, D., & Sharp, D. (1990i). Problem-based learning in an MBA economics
course: Confessions of a first-time user. In Problem-based learning in the
information age. San Francisco, CA: Wiley Periodicals.
Levine, L. (1996). The opening of the American mind. Boston: Beacon Press.
Light, G., & Cox, R. (2001). A critical matrix of learning and teaching. Great Britain:
Athenaeum Press.
Louie, B., Drevdahl, D., Purdy, J., & Stackman, R. (2003). Advancing the scholarship of
teaching through collaborative self-study. Journal of Higher Learning, 74, 150171.

MacGregor, J., Tinto, V., & Lindblad, J. (2001). Assessment of innovative efforts:
Lessons from the learning community movement. In Assessment to promote deep
learning. Fort Collins, CO: American Association for Higher Learning.
Marzano, R., Pickering, D., & McTighe, J. (1993). Assessing student outcomes.
Alexandria, VA: McREL Institute.
Miller, J. (1996). On learning why I became a teacher. In Rhythms of academic life.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Mu, S,. & Gnyawali, D. (2003). Developing synergistic knowledge in student groups.
Journal of Higher Education, 74, 689-711.
Newstead, S., & Hoskins, S. (2002). Encouraging student motivation. In Learning to
think: Disciplinary perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Nkomo, S. (1996). Teaching as an act of scholarship. In Rhythms of academic life.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Nord, W. (1996). Research/teaching boundaries. In Rhythms of academic life. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Osterman, K., & Kottkamp, R. (2004). Reflective practice for educators. Thousand Oaks,
CA.: Corwin Press.
Overton, T. (1999). Key aspects of teaching and learning in experimental sciences and
engineering. In Teaching and learning in higher education. Great Britain: Bell &
Bain Limited.
Pike, G., & Kuhs, G. (2005). First and second generation college students: A comparison
of their engagement and intellectual development. Journal of Higher Education,
76, 276-298.
Race, P. (1998). Refreshing your lecturing. In The lecturers toolkit. Great Britain:
Thanet Press.
Race, P. (1998). Making small-group teaching work. In The lecturers toolkit. Great
Britain: Thanet Press.
Ramsden, P. (1993). Approaches to learning. In Learning to teach in higher education.
London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Robinson, S. (2000). Assessment to promote deep learning. Testing disadvantage
students: The elusive search for what is fair. Fort Collins, CO: American
Association for Higher Education.

Royse, D. (2001). Basic course components. In Teaching tips. Needham Heights, MA:
Allyn & Bacon.
Salmon, J. (1983). Teaching in racially and culturally diverse environments. In Teaching
in college. Cleveland, OH: Info-Tec.
Savage, E., & Sterry, L. (1990). A conceptual framework for technology education.
Reston, VA.
Sheafor, B., & Sheafor, B. (2001) Grading. In Teaching tips. Needham Heights, MA:
Allyn & Bacon.
Snyder, J., & Hales, J. (1981). Jackson Mill industrial arts curriculum theory. West
Virginia: Department of Education.
Srisethanil, C. (1995). Engineering: Providing adaptive teaching in the engineering
tutor. Frontiers in Education Conference.
Sutherland, T., & Bonwell, C. (1996a). A range of options for faculty. The active learning
continuum: Choosing activities to engage students in the classroom. In Using
active learning in college classes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sutherland, T., & Bonwell, C. (1996b). A range of options for faculty. Cooperative
learning: Making groupwork work. In Using active learning in college classes.
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sutherland, T., & Bonwell, C. (1996c). A range of options for faculty. Enhancing the
lecture: Revitalizing a traditional format. In Using active learning in college
classes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sutherland, T., & Bonwell, C. (1996d). A range of options for faculty. Emerging issues in
the discussion of active learning. In Using active learning in college classes. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sutherland, T., & Bonwell, C. (1996e). A range of options for faculty. Encouraging selfassessment: Writing as active learning. In Using active learning in college
classes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sutherland, T., & Bonwell, C. (1996f). A range of options for faculty. Providing
structure: The critical element. In Using active learning in college classes. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sutherland, T., & Bonwell, C. (1996g). A range of options for faculty. Using electronic
tools to promote active learning. In Using active learning in college classes. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Taylor, S. (1996). Becoming a teacher. In Rhythms of academic life. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications.
Walvoord, B., & Anderson, V. (1998). Effective grading. San Francisco, CA.: JosseyBass.
Weaver, R., & Qi J. (2005). Classroom organization and participation: College students
perceptions. Journal of Higher Learning, 76, 570-601.
Wright, B. (2000). Assessment to promote deep learning. Accreditation - where credit is
due. Fort Collins, CO: American Association for Higher Education.
Zhao, C., Kuhs, G., & Carni, R. (2005). Comparison of international student and
American student engagement in effective educational practices. Journal of
Higher Education, 76, 209-229.
Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1992). Action research in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
Zywno, M. (2003). A contribution to validation of score meaning for Felder-Solomons
index of learning styles. Journal of Engineering Education, 78.
Websites
About grades.
Website: www.math.usf.edu/-mccolm/pedagogy/GRADElong.html
Argyris. C. (1976). Double loop learning.
Website: stmail.fju.edu.tw/clinical/theory/double.htm
Argyris, C. (1976). Double loop learning.
Website: tip.psychology.org/argyris.html
Argyris, C. Theories of action, double loop learning and organizational learning,
Website: www.infed.org/thinkers/argyris.htm
Brainstorming.
Website: www.graphic.org/branist.html
Classroom assessment.
Website: fcit.usf.edu/assessment/performance/assessb.html
Creating your own rubrics.
Website: www.2learn.ca/projects/together/START/rubricc.html
Collaboration rubric.
Website: edweb.sdsu.edu/triton/tidepoolunit/rubrics/collrubric.html

Concept mapping.
Website: www.coun.uvic.ca/learn/program/hndouts/map_ho.tml
Concept mapping.
Website: users.edte.utewente.nl/lanzing/cm_home.htm
Education Research Report. What do student grades mean?
Website: www.ed.gov/pubs/OR/ResearchRpts/grades.html
Evaluation of lab exercise.
Website: www.engr.sjsu.edu/assessment/topic/rubricLab.htm
Felder, R., & Soloman, B. Learning styles and strategies.
Website: www.ncsu.edu/felder-publec/ILSdir/styles.htn
Felder, R. Reaching the second tier.
Website: www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Papers/Secondtier.html
Genes-r-us problem-solving rubric.
Website: cte.jhu.edu/techacademy/web/2000/Roberson/Problem.html
Georgia State University analytical assessment guide.
Website: www.winona.edu/air/resourcelinks/analyticalrubric.htm
Grading practices.
Website: //teaching.berkelye.edu/ggd/grading.html
History of influence in the development of intelligence theory & testing.
Website: www.indiana.eduWintell/map.shtml
Kinds of concept maps.
Website: classes.aces.uiuc.edu?ACES100/Mind/c-m2.html
Learning styles.
Website: www.Idpride.net/learningstyles.MI.htm
Learning styles.
Website: ww.ncsu.edu
Learning styles in the DVC survey.
Website: www.metamath.com/Isweb/fourls.htm
Maryland technology performance task summaries.
Website: www.smcm.edu/msce-pt3/TaskSummaries.htm

Master teacher program: On learning styles.

Website: www.2.gsu.edu/dschjb/wwwmbti.html
Pelley, J. Concept mapping.
Website: classes.aces.uiuc.edu/ACES100/Mind/c-m2.html
Practical assessment, research & evaluation.
Website: pareonline.net/getvn.asp
Pros and cons of typical grading practices.
Website: depts..washington.edu/grading/plan/procon.htm
Rubric: Essay research and bibliography.
Website:
www.markville.ss.yrdsb.edu.on.ca/history/history/definingmomentsrubric.html
Soloman, B., & Felder, R. Index of learning styles questionnaire.
Website: www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html
Table of specifications.
Website: home.regent.edu/louz/00tblspecsmtp.htm
Table of specifications. Information for examination.
Website: ed.uno.edu/faculty/joescher/EDFR6700/Assessments?TSExam2.htm
Table of specifications.
Website: people.uncw.edu/moallemm/sites/tableofspecificationassesss.htm
Tools for teaching. Grading practices.
Website: teaching.berkeley.edu/bgd/grading.html
Trochim, W. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation.
Website: www.socialresearchmethods.net/research/epp1/epp1.htm
University of Minnesota Duluth. Learning styles.
Website: www.d.umn.edu/student.loon/acad/strate/Irnsty.html
What do student grades mean? Differences across schools.
Website: www.ed.gov/pubs/OR/researchrpts/grades.html
What should grades mean?
Website: www.ai.uga.edu/mc/grading.html
Whats your learning style?
Website: www.usd.edu/trio/tut/ts/style.html

10