Professional Documents
Culture Documents
People Vs Bokingco
People Vs Bokingco
People Vs Bokingco
engaged in carrying out the conspiracy. As we have previously discussed, we did not
find any sufficient evidence to establish the existence of conspiracy. It was during
the preliminary investigation that Bokingco mentioned his and Cols plan to kill
Pasion. Bokingcos confession was admittedly taken without the assistance of
counsel in violation of Section 12, Article III of the 1987 Constitution. Therefore, the
extrajudicial confession has no probative value and is inadmissible in evidence
against Col. WHEREFORE, the appeal is GRANTED. The Decision of the Court of
Appeals is REVERSED and SET ASIDE. Appellant Reynante Col is ACQUITTED on
ground of reasonable doubt.Appellant Michael Bokingco is found GUILTY beyond
reasonable doubt of the crime of Homicide