Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. David Michael Arvelo, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    27 views2 pages
    The document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. David Michael Arvelo was convicted of a crime and his appointed attorney, Chet Kaufman, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief stating there are no arguable issues of merit to appeal. After reviewing the full case record, the court's panel of judges granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed both Arvelo's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-10-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-10315

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. David Michael Arvelo was convicted of a crime and his appointed attorney, Chet Kaufman, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief stating there are no arguable issues of merit to appeal. After reviewing the full case record, the court's panel of judges granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed both Arvelo's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    27 views2 pages

    United States v. David Michael Arvelo, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. David Michael Arvelo was convicted of a crime and his appointed attorney, Chet Kaufman, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief stating there are no arguable issues of merit to appeal. After reviewing the full case record, the court's panel of judges granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed both Arvelo's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 14-10315

    Date Filed: 10/07/2014

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-10315
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00025-MW-GRJ-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    DAVID MICHAEL ARVELO,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Florida
    ________________________
    (October 7, 2014)

    Case: 14-10315

    Date Filed: 10/07/2014

    Page: 2 of 2

    Before HULL, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.


    PER CURIAM:
    Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for David Michael Arvelo, in this direct
    criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
    appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
    1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
    that counsels assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
    independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
    counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Arvelos conviction and
    sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like