Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Plamen Atanosov, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is a court filing summarizing a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Plamen Atanasov was convicted of a crime and his appointed counsel, Mary Erickson, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed an Anders brief stating there are no arguable issues of merit for appeal. The court's independent review found counsel's assessment to be correct and affirmed both Atanasov's conviction and sentence, granting the motion for counsel to withdraw.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-01-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-12077

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court filing summarizing a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Plamen Atanasov was convicted of a crime and his appointed counsel, Mary Erickson, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed an Anders brief stating there are no arguable issues of merit for appeal. The court's independent review found counsel's assessment to be correct and affirmed both Atanasov's conviction and sentence, granting the motion for counsel to withdraw.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Plamen Atanosov, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court filing summarizing a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Plamen Atanasov was convicted of a crime and his appointed counsel, Mary Erickson, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed an Anders brief stating there are no arguable issues of merit for appeal. The court's independent review found counsel's assessment to be correct and affirmed both Atanasov's conviction and sentence, granting the motion for counsel to withdraw.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 14-12077

    Date Filed: 01/21/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]


    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-12077
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00026-ODE-AJB-1
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    PLAMEN ATANASOV,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    __________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Georgia
    _________________________
    (January 21, 2015)
    Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Mary Erickson, appointed counsel for Plamen Atanasov in this direct criminal
    appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed
    a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d
    493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsels

    Case: 14-12077

    Date Filed: 01/21/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent


    examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels
    motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Atanasovs conviction and sentence are
    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like