Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Lee Anthony Guidry, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    19 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of appointed counsel Robert Ratliff to withdraw from representing Lee Anthony Guidry in his direct criminal appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the panel of judges agreed with counsel's assessment that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. As a result, the court affirmed both Guidry's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-03-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-12252

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of appointed counsel Robert Ratliff to withdraw from representing Lee Anthony Guidry in his direct criminal appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the panel of judges agreed with counsel's assessment that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. As a result, the court affirmed both Guidry's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    19 views2 pages

    United States v. Lee Anthony Guidry, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of appointed counsel Robert Ratliff to withdraw from representing Lee Anthony Guidry in his direct criminal appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the panel of judges agreed with counsel's assessment that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. As a result, the court affirmed both Guidry's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 14-12252

    Date Filed: 03/20/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-12252
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00039-WS-B-4
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    LEE ANTHONY GUIDRY,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Alabama
    ________________________
    (March 20, 2015)
    Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Robert Ratliff, appointed counsel for Lee Anthony Guidry in this direct
    criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Guidry and

    Case: 14-12252

    Date Filed: 03/20/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).
    Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of
    the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
    entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is
    GRANTED, and Guidrys conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like