Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Romon Mandel Thomas, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Romon Mandel Thomas was convicted of a crime in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. His appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. Upon independent review of the record, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found counsel's assessment to be correct and identified no issues of merit. Therefore, the court granted counsel's motion to withdraw and affirmed Thomas's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-04-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-14896

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Romon Mandel Thomas was convicted of a crime in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. His appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. Upon independent review of the record, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found counsel's assessment to be correct and identified no issues of merit. Therefore, the court granted counsel's motion to withdraw and affirmed Thomas's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Romon Mandel Thomas, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Romon Mandel Thomas was convicted of a crime in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. His appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. Upon independent review of the record, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found counsel's assessment to be correct and identified no issues of merit. Therefore, the court granted counsel's motion to withdraw and affirmed Thomas's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 14-14896

    Date Filed: 04/22/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]


    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-14896
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00012-MW-GRJ-1
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    ROMON MANDEL THOMAS,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Florida
    ________________________
    (April 22, 2015)
    Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Randolph P. Murrell and Jennifer Anne Hart, appointed counsel for Romon
    Mandel Thomas in this direct criminal appeal, have moved to withdraw from
    further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

    Case: 14-14896

    Date Filed: 04/22/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
    review of the entire record reveals that counselss assessment of the relative merit
    of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record
    reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
    and Thomas=s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like