Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    United States v. Carlos Rodrigo Hernandez, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It states that Carlos Rodrigo Hernandez's appointed defense attorney has filed a motion to withdraw from representing Hernandez and has submitted an Anders brief, which means there are no non-frivolous issues to appeal. The court's independent review found no issues of merit, so it granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed both Hernandez's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Carlos Rodrigo Hernandez, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It states that Carlos Rodrigo Hernandez's appointed defense attorney has filed a motion to withdraw from representing Hernandez and has submitted an Anders brief, which means there are no non-frivolous issues to appeal. The court's independent review found no issues of merit, so it granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed both Hernandez's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-09-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-10368

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It states that Carlos Rodrigo Hernandez's appointed defense attorney has filed a motion to withdraw from representing Hernandez and has submitted an Anders brief, which means there are no non-frivolous issues to appeal. The court's independent review found no issues of merit, so it granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed both Hernandez's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    United States v. Carlos Rodrigo Hernandez, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It states that Carlos Rodrigo Hernandez's appointed defense attorney has filed a motion to withdraw from representing Hernandez and has submitted an Anders brief, which means there are no non-frivolous issues to appeal. The court's independent review found no issues of merit, so it granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed both Hernandez's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 15-10368

    Date Filed: 09/18/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 15-10368
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 2:13-cr-00144-SPC-CM-1
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    CARLOS RODRIGO HERNANDEZ,
    a.k.a. Miguel Angel Leyva-Romero,
    a.k.a. Carlos Rodrigo-Hernandez,
    a.k.a. Carlos Hernandez-Rodrigo,
    a.k.a. Miguel Angel Leiva-Romero,

    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Florida
    ________________________
    (September 18, 2015)
    Before JORDAN, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 15-10368

    Date Filed: 09/18/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    The Office of the Federal Defender, appointed counsel in this direct criminal
    appeal for Carlos Rodrigo Hernandez, has moved to withdraw from further
    representation of Hernandez and has filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
    California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
    independent review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of the
    relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
    entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is
    GRANTED, and Hernandezs conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like