Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Richard Tucker, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Richard Tucker appealed his conviction and sentence in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. Tucker's appointed counsel, Chet Kaufman, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and submitted an Anders brief, stating there were no arguable issues of merit. After independently reviewing the record, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no issues of merit and granted counsel's motion to withdraw. The court affirmed Tucker's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-07-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-14135

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Richard Tucker appealed his conviction and sentence in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. Tucker's appointed counsel, Chet Kaufman, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and submitted an Anders brief, stating there were no arguable issues of merit. After independently reviewing the record, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no issues of merit and granted counsel's motion to withdraw. The court affirmed Tucker's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Richard Tucker, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Richard Tucker appealed his conviction and sentence in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. Tucker's appointed counsel, Chet Kaufman, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and submitted an Anders brief, stating there were no arguable issues of merit. After independently reviewing the record, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no issues of merit and granted counsel's motion to withdraw. The court affirmed Tucker's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 13-14135

    Date Filed: 07/17/2014

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 13-14135
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00030-RH-CAS-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    RICHARD TUCKER,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Florida
    ________________________
    (July 17, 2014)
    Before WILSON, PRYOR and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 13-14135

    Date Filed: 07/17/2014

    Page: 2 of 2

    Chet Kaufman, on behalf of Randolph Murrell, appointed counsel for


    Richard Tucker, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
    appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
    1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
    that counsels assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
    independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
    counsels motion is GRANTED, and Tuckers conviction and sentence are
    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like