Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Frank William Johannissohn, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Frank Johannissohn appealed his criminal convictions and sentences to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Johannissohn's appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no issues of merit and affirmed both Johannissohn's convictions and sentences. The court granted the motion for counsel to withdraw.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-12-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-12446

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Frank Johannissohn appealed his criminal convictions and sentences to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Johannissohn's appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no issues of merit and affirmed both Johannissohn's convictions and sentences. The court granted the motion for counsel to withdraw.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Frank William Johannissohn, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Frank Johannissohn appealed his criminal convictions and sentences to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Johannissohn's appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no issues of merit and affirmed both Johannissohn's convictions and sentences. The court granted the motion for counsel to withdraw.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 15-12446

    Date Filed: 12/01/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 15-12446
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 4:14-cr-00040-RH-CAS-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    FRANK WILLIAM JOHANNISSOHN,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Florida
    ________________________
    (December 1, 2015)
    Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 15-12446

    Date Filed: 12/01/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    Randall S. Lockhart, appointed counsel for Frank Johannissohn in this direct


    criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
    appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.
    1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
    reveals that counsels assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
    Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
    merit, counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Johannissohns
    convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like